Lessons learned from implementing the Devices Profile for Web Services

Zeeb, Elmar; Bobek, A.; Bonn, H.; Golatowski, Frank

doi:10.1109/dest.2007.371975

Cited by 22 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…security, plug & play, asynchronous and event-driven exchange) [13]. DPWS allows sending secure messages to and from web services, dynamically discovering a web service, describing a web service, subscribing to and receiving events from a web service [16].…”

Section: Service Technology For Devicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Service-oriented computing in manufacturing automation: A SWOT analysis

Mendes

Leitão

Colombo

2011

2011 9th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Service-oriented Computing (SOC) is being applied in industrial manufacturing automation to face the current demand for modular, flexible and reconfigurable solutions. Highlighted from the other existing methodologies, SOC may carry an alternative but natural solution to design and engineer manufacturing automation systems and consequently the ability to seamless integrate into the modern IT-enterprise. However, SOC still has a long way to be adopted by industrial solutions, mainly fulfilling the particularities of the manufacturing domain. This paper discusses the applicability of the SOC in industrial manufacturing automation by using a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis. The discussed aspects show the great potential of SOC to solve industrial manufacturing automation problems, but also the need to smooth some sharp edges.

show abstract

Section: Service Technology For Devicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Service-oriented computing in manufacturing automation: A SWOT analysis

Mendes

Leitão

Colombo

2011

2011 9th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…DPWS specification is a set of very general standards based on SOAP. While protocol generality can be considered as an advantage that can lead to acceptability and even interoperability, it brings also complexity in the design of a concrete framework [15].…”

Section: Advantages and Disadvantagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…DPWS was mainly developed by Microsoft and some printer device manufacturers. DPWS allows sending secure messages to and from Web services, dynamically discovering a Web service, describing a Web service, subscribing to, and receiving events from a Web service [15].…”

Section: Device Profile For Web Services: An Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distributed Control Patterns using Device Profile for Web Services

Mendes

Rodrigues

Leitão

et al. 2008

2008 12th Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Automation systems are changing from the centriccontrolled approach to a more flexible and autonomous behavior. The contribution to this philosophy comes from several technologies, including service-oriented concepts. This work focus on some open points of enhanced communication and control patterns and presents it in form of a multi-use communication module. For the development of such systems, the SOA4D implementation of Device Profile for Web Services (DPWS) was used. The specified communication structure that works on top of the DPWS toolkit can be integrated in software applications targeting but not limited to embedded devices. The resulting interaction patterns also establish a stronger association to real life services and define flexible communication routines between service requester and provider.

show abstract

“…However, this solution is not always supported by sparse embedded devices, e.g. home automation devices are featured by sparse resources and low processing power and solutions as web services are unsatisfactory because they put high demands on the embedded devices [27]. Other approaches have been driven to service-oriented infrastructures based on the Device Profile for Web Services (WS-DP or DPWS) [28].…”

Section: Background and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Process for Implementing Gateways for Test Tools

Díaz

Yagüe

Garbajosa

2009

2009 16th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Test automation is facing a new challenge because tools, as well as having to provide conventional test functionalities, must be capable to interact with ever more heterogeneous complex systems under test (SUT). The number of existing software interfaces to access these systems is also a growing number. The problem cannot be analyzed only from a technical or engineering perspective; the economic perspective is as important. This paper presents a process to systematically implement gateways which support the communication between test tools and SUTs with a reduced cost. The proposed solution does not preclude any interface protocol at the SUT side. This process is supported using a generic architecture of a gateway defined on top of OSGi. Any test tool can communicate with the gateway through a unique defined interface. To communicate the gateway and the SUT, basically, the driver corresponding to the SUT software interface has to be loaded.

show abstract

Lessons learned from implementing the Devices Profile for Web Services

Cited by 22 publications

References 1 publication

Service-oriented computing in manufacturing automation: A SWOT analysis

Service-oriented computing in manufacturing automation: A SWOT analysis

Distributed Control Patterns using Device Profile for Web Services

A Systematic Process for Implementing Gateways for Test Tools

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About