Traits associated with courtship and mating can evolve rapidly and often result in striking differences in sexually selected traits among closely related species, for example, as in the displays of male bowerbirds, the coloration of male cichlid fish, and the song pulse rate in field crickets (reviewed by Broder et al., 2021;Svensson & Gosden, 2007;Zuk & Tinghitella, 2008). The morphology of ant males appears to be much more conservative and on a first glance differs little between congeneric species (e.g., Wheeler, 1910). The morphology and behavior of ant males are adapted to locating and approaching a female sexual and to mating. The typical mating syndromes of ants, male aggregation and female calling, do not give males much opportunity for elaborate courtship displays or male-male antagonism other than scramble competition (Boomsma et al., 2005;Hölldobler & Bartz, 1985). Ant males cannot easily obtain and defend a harem of queens and, like the males of other social Hymenoptera, start their sexual life with