2019
DOI: 10.1002/hep.30409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter to the Editor: Hepatic Resection Compared to Chemoembolization in Intermediate‐ to Advanced‐Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comment For Moving Forward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,22 The current study is one of the largest cohorts of patients undergoing liver resection outside the BCLC criteria (n = 157 patients with BCLC stage B HCC) reported in the literature. 20,23,24 By exclusively analyzing BCLC stage B patients who underwent resection, we were able to determine that the 5-year OS of 49.9% (95% CI 37.8-60.9) was similar to patients having BCLC stage A1 tumors. Thus, the data support surgery as being beneficial in select patients with BCLC stage B HCC.…”
Section: B Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 The current study is one of the largest cohorts of patients undergoing liver resection outside the BCLC criteria (n = 157 patients with BCLC stage B HCC) reported in the literature. 20,23,24 By exclusively analyzing BCLC stage B patients who underwent resection, we were able to determine that the 5-year OS of 49.9% (95% CI 37.8-60.9) was similar to patients having BCLC stage A1 tumors. Thus, the data support surgery as being beneficial in select patients with BCLC stage B HCC.…”
Section: B Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of surgical resection was noted in all subgroup analyses, including analyses stratified by BCLC stage (BCLC-B, HR = 0.53, 95%CI: 0.43-0.65; BCLC-C, HR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.59-0.77), as well as study type (RCT + PSM NRCT, HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.53-0.78; all studies, HR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.51-0.67) [10] . Although this meta-analysis further called into question the recommended treatment algorithm proposed by the current BCLC classification schema [10] , it was later criticized for inconsistencies in inclusion criteria/definition of BCLC stages [i.e., 39%-86% of patients had single large tumors (> 5 cm) in the BCLC-B group], overlapping populations among individual studies, as well as sequential treatments offered to patients (i.e., not only surgery or TACE) that prevented a "true" comparison of surgery vs. TACE for intermediate or advanced stage HCC [19,20] . Despite data favoring resection over TACE for select patients with BCLC-B tumors, the majority of available data derive from retrospective analyses that are subject to selection bias.…”
Section: Resection Beyond Bclc Criteria: Is It Justified In Select Patients?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier version of the BCLC system classified large solitary HCC beyong 5 cm with an expansive growth as intermediate disease. Namely, intermediate disease definition includes a wide range of patients according to liver function and tumour burden, which triggered a major controversy to further stratify intermediate stage HCC according to tumor burden and liver function [17][18][19] . Nowadays, guideline from European Association for the Study of the Liver [13] and several reviews written by BCLC proponents seems trying to recalibrate their position stating that if technically feasible patients with large solitary HCC beyond 5 cm should be classified as BCLC stage A.…”
Section: Should Postoperative Hcc Patients Receive Adjuvant Treatmmentioning
confidence: 99%