Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies 2019
DOI: 10.5220/0007577600490056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level Set Segmentation of Retinal OCT Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method segments the NFL better, with RMSE and DC of 0.0179 and 0.970, which can be attributed to the preprocessing steps in isolating the layers and the segmentation method's ability to handle intensity inconsistency. The error in Chiu et al [42] is due to the inability of standard shortest path algorithms (e.g., [45]) to handle inhomogeneity such as that of the OCT. Also, [18] outperforms [20] in the NFL because in some cases the later converges at a local minimum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed method segments the NFL better, with RMSE and DC of 0.0179 and 0.970, which can be attributed to the preprocessing steps in isolating the layers and the segmentation method's ability to handle intensity inconsistency. The error in Chiu et al [42] is due to the inability of standard shortest path algorithms (e.g., [45]) to handle inhomogeneity such as that of the OCT. Also, [18] outperforms [20] in the NFL because in some cases the later converges at a local minimum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inherently, due to the regional competition in [18], it adapts to the RPE region topology better than the proposed method, although both methods do not employ region limitation or topology constraints. Generally, region limitation based on retinal layer topology aids in handling incompleteness in [17], [20], [42], while FCM aids in handling inhomogeneity within layers by adaptively estimating values specific to each image in [18] and the proposed method. This can be deduced from the NFL layer performance discussed earlier based on the performance matrix in Table 1, and in comparison of [18] and the proposed method to [17], [42] for the level set and graph cut methods, 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations