1979
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(79)90683-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level structure of 100Tc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the coincident γ-rays shown there are either inconsistent with the placements in the adopted decay scheme [8], or are not placed in the decay scheme at all. In particular, the γ-rays with energies of 31, 43, 75, 99, 105, 179 and 181 keV are all shown on the Pinston decay scheme as not being in coincidence with the 299 keV γ-ray.…”
Section: Tc(nγγ) 100 Tc Coincidence Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Many of the coincident γ-rays shown there are either inconsistent with the placements in the adopted decay scheme [8], or are not placed in the decay scheme at all. In particular, the γ-rays with energies of 31, 43, 75, 99, 105, 179 and 181 keV are all shown on the Pinston decay scheme as not being in coincidence with the 299 keV γ-ray.…”
Section: Tc(nγγ) 100 Tc Coincidence Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Each sum gives a value of the neutron binding energy of 100 Tc. The average of the sums for the 10 lowest laying levels fed by primary gamma rays of 100 Tc was calculated to give a new value of the neutron binding energy of: E b = 6764.85 ± 0.25 keV which is 0.45 keV higher and has four times smaller uncertainty than the previously accepted value [8] in TOI.…”
Section: Neutron Binding Energy Of 100 Tcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relative efficiency was determined using radioactive sources and capture γ -rays as described elsewhere [6]. Partial cross-sections for the strong 172, 223 and 263 keV capture γ -rays [7,8] as well as for the 539 and 591 keV γ -rays from 100 Tc decay [9] were determined from the same in-beam spectrum. In the latter case, however, the yield of a decay line is proportional to the effective counting time:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%