1977
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.15.894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels ofGe68excited by the (p, t) reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raman et al [24] deduce |Q| = 1.20(9) from the measured B(E2; 0 + 1 → 2 + 1 ), closer to the FPD6(4) result. Early shell model calculations by de Vries et al [19] and Guilbault et al [25] were similar to ours but less successful in reproducing the experimental data. This may have been due to the use of a simpler interaction, nucleon configuration truncations, and/or the extension to higher excitation energies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Raman et al [24] deduce |Q| = 1.20(9) from the measured B(E2; 0 + 1 → 2 + 1 ), closer to the FPD6(4) result. Early shell model calculations by de Vries et al [19] and Guilbault et al [25] were similar to ours but less successful in reproducing the experimental data. This may have been due to the use of a simpler interaction, nucleon configuration truncations, and/or the extension to higher excitation energies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Three experimental levels around 1.2 MeV are rather difficult to explain, if they have negative parity. The level structure of 68Ge became clear recently through the V~ 68Ge work [52] and the study of the beta decay of 6SAs [53]. The results of the present calculation are compared with those of the two works in Figure 6.…”
Section: The Ga Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A tentative assignment of J~=6 + was given to a level observed at 3.70MeV [54]. Guilbault et al [52] did not excited this level. Instead, they gave a tentative assignment of J'=6 + to a level observed at 4.46 MeV.…”
Section: The Ga Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the coexistence of a shape transition from spherical to weakly deformed and a coexistence of different types of deformation are expected in these nuclei [23 -25]. Qualitatively these features can be explained with the help of the Nilsson model calculation [26], shell model calculation [27], constrained Hartree-Fock calculation [28], twoquasiparticle plus-rotor calculation [13],and IBA model calculation [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%