2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-012-0782-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levelset based fluid topology optimization using the extended finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Kreissl et al (Kreissl et al 2011) discussed the topology optimization of flow domains using a parametric level-set approach in which a lattice Boltzmann method is adopted to predict the flow field. Kreissl et al (Kreissl and Maute 2012) also utilized the extended finite element method to study the level set based fluid topology optimization. Deng et al (Deng et al 2013) applied the level set method to study the topology optimization of steady Navier-Stokes flows with body forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Kreissl et al (Kreissl et al 2011) discussed the topology optimization of flow domains using a parametric level-set approach in which a lattice Boltzmann method is adopted to predict the flow field. Kreissl et al (Kreissl and Maute 2012) also utilized the extended finite element method to study the level set based fluid topology optimization. Deng et al (Deng et al 2013) applied the level set method to study the topology optimization of steady Navier-Stokes flows with body forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the physical model specifies Dirichlet boundary conditions along phase boundaries, the XFEM needs to be augmented by interface constraint methods, such as stabilized Lagrange multiplier or penalty methods. For example, Kreissl and Maute (2012) solved flow topology optimization problems by enforcing the stick boundary conditions along the fluid-solid interface via a stabilized Lagrange multiplier formulation. Subsequently, this approach will be discussed in detail.…”
Section: Extended Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design sensitivities are computed by an adjoint method. Both examples are described in detail in Kreissl and Maute (2012).…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, in the model the fluid is able to penetrate the medium at the cost of a huge pressure loss, so care should be taken to check the influence of possible flow in these regions of the final designs, c.f. Kreissl and Maute (2012) for further discussions. The steady state equations yield…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%