2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging shared connectivity to aggregate heterogeneous datasets into a common response space

Abstract: Connectivity hyperalignment can be used to estimate a single shared response space across disjoint datasets. We develop a connectivity-based shared response model that factorizes aggregated fMRI datasets into a single reduced-dimension shared connectivity space and subject-specific topographic transformations. These transformations resolve idiosyncratic functional topographies and can be used to project response time series into shared space. We evaluate this algorithm on a large collection of heterogeneous, n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that individual differences in fine-grained patterns of functional connectivity are a markedly better predictor of general intelligence than are coarse-grained patterns, indicating that differences in cortical architecture that underlie inter-individual variation in the efficiency of information processing are more evident at the same spatial scale as topographic patterns that encode information. Discovering the dominant role of fine-grained connectivity patterns in the neural basis of intelligence required a method that resolves individual differences in these idiosyncratic patterns, a method that was not available prior to hyperalignment (Feilong et al, 2018; Guntupalli et al, 2018, 2016; Haxby et al, 2020, 2011; Nastase etal., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that individual differences in fine-grained patterns of functional connectivity are a markedly better predictor of general intelligence than are coarse-grained patterns, indicating that differences in cortical architecture that underlie inter-individual variation in the efficiency of information processing are more evident at the same spatial scale as topographic patterns that encode information. Discovering the dominant role of fine-grained connectivity patterns in the neural basis of intelligence required a method that resolves individual differences in these idiosyncratic patterns, a method that was not available prior to hyperalignment (Feilong et al, 2018; Guntupalli et al, 2018, 2016; Haxby et al, 2020, 2011; Nastase etal., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H2A and RHA both require that participants share the same time-locked stimulus with the same number of time points, so they cannot be applied to resting-state data or data sets that implement different stimuli. Because CHA aligns functional connectivity profiles rather than time series data, it alone can be used with datasets that don’t have time-locked stimuli ( Guntupalli et al 2018 ; Nastase et al, 2020 ). Although we derive the RHA and CHA estimates from the same movie stimulus in the current application of H2A, the CHA component of the algorithm could also be applied to subjects with both movie and resting-state scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SRM procedure thus has the effect of highlighting (shared) music-related variance (see Figure 3 for diagram of analysis pipeline). The "optimal" number of shared features will tend to vary across both stimuli and brain areas (e.g., as determined by cross-validation); here, for the sake of simplicity, we fixed the number of shared features at 30 as a reasonable middle ground based on values used in prior work (Chen et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2017;Nastase et al, 2020). We applied an SRM with parameters estimated from run 1 to transform the run 2 data, and applied an SRM with parameters estimated from run 2 to transform the run 1 data.…”
Section: Shared Response Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%