2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging the benefits of modularity in the provision of integrated solutions: A strategic learning perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both projects and firms, new systems integration challenges arise as modularity enables greater outsourcing of design as well as manufacturing (Brusoni & Prencipe, 2011), and as firms leverage the benefits of modularity to enable economies of scale in associated services (Salonen, Rajala, & Virtanen, 2018). Davies and Mackenzie’s (2014) work on the London 2012 Olympics finds that systems integration takes place at different levels within the megaproject, with the client and its delivery partner involved at a meta-systems integration level, and contractors involved in integration at the systems level, with “clearly-defined interfaces and buffers between and within individual component systems” (Davies & Mackenzie, 2014, p. 787).…”
Section: Background: Innovation and Knowledge Codificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both projects and firms, new systems integration challenges arise as modularity enables greater outsourcing of design as well as manufacturing (Brusoni & Prencipe, 2011), and as firms leverage the benefits of modularity to enable economies of scale in associated services (Salonen, Rajala, & Virtanen, 2018). Davies and Mackenzie’s (2014) work on the London 2012 Olympics finds that systems integration takes place at different levels within the megaproject, with the client and its delivery partner involved at a meta-systems integration level, and contractors involved in integration at the systems level, with “clearly-defined interfaces and buffers between and within individual component systems” (Davies & Mackenzie, 2014, p. 787).…”
Section: Background: Innovation and Knowledge Codificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, Worm et al (2017) suggest that providing customer solutions has positive associations with profitability for firms that have strong sales capabilities and in industries with strong buyer power, but not necessarily in technology intensive industries. Many firms have taken a somewhat skeptical approach to customer solutions provision, instead opting for mass customization since this accommodates fragmented market contexts better than true customer solutions provision (Kowalkowski et al, 2015; Salonen et al, 2018). For many B2B markets, the importance of customer solutions is likely to continue, particularly since there are many industries that have strong buyer power.…”
Section: Contemporary Issues In B2b Marketing – Beyond Ai and Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It conceptualizes a solution as consisting of service modules, product modules and knowledge modules with different and pertinent features, while previous research only focuses on service-product bundles (Bask et al, 2010;Evanschitzky, Wangenheim, & Woisetschläger, 2011;Pekkarinen & Ulkuniemi, 2008) or considers a solution generally as a bundle of knowledge components (Valtakoski, 2017). While previous research has discussed using a modular structure to orchestrate business networks (Bask et al, 2010;Salonen et al, 2018), this study not only confirms the important role of a carefully designed modular structure in this process but also reveals the differential impacts different module features have on interfirm coordination in a digital platform context.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%