The majority of the world's children grow up learning two or more languages. The study of early bilingualism is central to current psycholinguistics, offering insights into issues such as transfer and interference in development. From an applied perspective, it poses a universal challenge to language assessment practices throughout childhood, as typically developing bilingual children usually underperform relative to monolingual norms when assessed in one language only. We measured vocabulary with Communicative Development Inventories for 372 24-month-old toddlers learning British English and one Additional Language out of a diverse set of 13 (Bengali, Cantonese, Dutch, French, German, Greek, Hindi-Urdu, Italian, Mandarin, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, and Welsh). We furthered theoretical understanding of bilingual development by showing, for the first time, that linguistic distance between the child's two languages predicts vocabulary outcome, with phonological overlap related to expressive vocabulary, and word order typology and morphological complexity related to receptive vocabulary, in the Additional Language. Our study also has crucial clinical implications: we have developed the first bilingual norms for expressive and receptive vocabulary for 24-month-olds learning British English and an Additional Language. These norms were derived from factors identified as uniquely predicting CDI vocabulary measures: the relative amount of English versus the Additional Language in child-directed input and parental overheard speech, and infant gender. The resulting UKBTAT tool was able to accurately predict the English vocabulary of an additional group of 58 bilinguals learning an Additional Language outside our target range. This offers a pragmatic method for the assessment of children in the majority language when no tool exists in the Additional Language. Our findings also suggest that the effect of linguistic distance might extend beyond bilinguals' acquisition of early vocabulary to encompass broader cognitive processes, and could constitute a key factor in the study of the debated bilingual advantage.Corresponding author: Caroline Floccia, School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK, email: caroline.floccia@plymouth.ac.uk DOI: 10.1111/mono.12348 # 2018 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
7Parents eagerly await the moment their 1-year-old infant produces their first word, and professionals working with young children track the appearance of the two-word combination stage at around age 2. To developmental psycholinguists, these two milestones in healthy language acquisition are supported by an impressive range of achievements, from the attuning of perceptual abilities (Werker, Yeung, & Yoshida, 2012), the development of word segmentation skills (Bergmann & Cristia, 2016), and the retrieval of word meaning (Stevens, Gleitman, Trueswell, & Yang, 2017), to the discovery of syntactic, morphological, and conversational rules (Gleason & Ratner, 2017; Hoff, 2013). The co...