1988
DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90015-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical, sublexical, and peripheral effects in skilled typewriting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
79
4
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
79
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we cannot distinguish between several possible constituents of chunks in skilled typing, such as syllables, morphemes, and digraphs. Previous studies have indicated that some of these constituents contribute to typing performance (e.g., Fendrick, 1937;Gentner et al, 1988;Inhoff, 1991;Shaffer & Hardwick, 1970;West & Sabban, 1982), but these studies do not indicate the level of processing at which these factors affect typing. Logan and Crump (2011) assumed that words are single chunks in the outer loop.…”
Section: On the Constituents Of Chunks In Skilled Typingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, we cannot distinguish between several possible constituents of chunks in skilled typing, such as syllables, morphemes, and digraphs. Previous studies have indicated that some of these constituents contribute to typing performance (e.g., Fendrick, 1937;Gentner et al, 1988;Inhoff, 1991;Shaffer & Hardwick, 1970;West & Sabban, 1982), but these studies do not indicate the level of processing at which these factors affect typing. Logan and Crump (2011) assumed that words are single chunks in the outer loop.…”
Section: On the Constituents Of Chunks In Skilled Typingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There has been a tendency to for researchers to theorise these independently (e.g., Gentner, Larochelle, & Grudin, 1988;van Galen, 1991). We know of no direct comparison of spelling processes in the two modalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the frequency with which specific letter pairs occur within written language, in this case Dutch and English) predicted interkeystroke intervals so that for higher frequency bigrams shorter intervals were found. Further, it has been demonstrated that the interval between two keystrokes is affected by syllabic boundaries (e.g., Gentner et al, 1988;Pinet et al, 2016;Weingarten et al, 2004): Interkeystroke intervals are longer when the same two letters belong to different syllables, compared to when they are part of the same syllable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%