2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexico-semantic access and audiovisual integration in the aging brain: Insights from mixed-effects regression analyses of event-related potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirically speaking, tasks involving lexical recognition—both in young and elderly individuals—with low cognitive loads such as naming tasks (which only require reading a sequence of letters, [ 17 , 24 ]), or experiments requiring a decisional factor such as the lexical decision task (LDT), show that pseudowords produce higher response times (RT) and lower accuracy than word recognition [ 25 , 26 ]. However, such differences do not necessarily reach significance levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically speaking, tasks involving lexical recognition—both in young and elderly individuals—with low cognitive loads such as naming tasks (which only require reading a sequence of letters, [ 17 , 24 ]), or experiments requiring a decisional factor such as the lexical decision task (LDT), show that pseudowords produce higher response times (RT) and lower accuracy than word recognition [ 25 , 26 ]. However, such differences do not necessarily reach significance levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using chronometric reading techniques have found that older individuals are slower than younger people (longer response time, RT) but are nearly equally accurate at word recognition tasks, both in isolation and in the context of sentences [ 8 , 19 ]. Additionally, studies using lexical decision tasks (LDT) and priming have also confirmed that older individuals take longer (higher RT) but make a similar number of errors as younger people in recognizing words and distinguishing them from pseudowords [ 20 ]. As for the fourth age, specific studies have revealed that the RT needed to recognize isolated words increases significantly compared to the third age, whereas the accuracy remains stable for low cognitive load tasks such as naming and priming [ 12 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%