1985
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1050311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leydig cell resistance to the cytotoxic effect of ethylene dimethanesulphonate in the adult rat testis

Abstract: Weekly doses of the Leydig cell cytotoxic ethylene dimethanesulphonate (EDS) were administered to adult male rats in an attempt to study the endocrine activity of the testis in the absence of Leydig cells. One week after the first dose serum testosterone and LH concentrations and seminal vesicle weights were close to levels in castrated rats and testicular human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) binding was severely depressed. These changes were maintained for a further week but subsequently began to return to, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that EDS may be directly toxic to immature Sertoli cells in culture (Roberts and Griswold, 1990) and that EDS can disrupt spermatogenesis in adult rats when administered in combination with long-term estrogen treatment (Sprando et al, 1990). Other evidence supports the contention that EDS is not directly cytotoxic to the seminiferous epithelium: (1) androgen supplementation prior to or given intermittently after in vivo EDS treatment can maintain normal spermatogenesis with no disruptive effects on the Sertoli cells (Jackson and Jackson, 1984;Sharpe et al, 1988131, and (2) weekly injections of EDS given to adult rats for 6 weeks have no greater antispermatogenic effects compared to a single administration (Morris, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It has been suggested that EDS may be directly toxic to immature Sertoli cells in culture (Roberts and Griswold, 1990) and that EDS can disrupt spermatogenesis in adult rats when administered in combination with long-term estrogen treatment (Sprando et al, 1990). Other evidence supports the contention that EDS is not directly cytotoxic to the seminiferous epithelium: (1) androgen supplementation prior to or given intermittently after in vivo EDS treatment can maintain normal spermatogenesis with no disruptive effects on the Sertoli cells (Jackson and Jackson, 1984;Sharpe et al, 1988131, and (2) weekly injections of EDS given to adult rats for 6 weeks have no greater antispermatogenic effects compared to a single administration (Morris, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Serum testosterone concentrations in EDS-injected rats were lower during the first two weeks following EDS treatment, and though they increased were lower than those of controls at 3-4 weeks after EDS injury. Nonetheless, testosterone levels did not differ significantly from control levels beyond 6 weeks after EDS injection (6). Ultrastructurally, only a few attenuated mesenchymal cells remained in the peritubular and/or perivascular regions within intertubular areas of testes 7 days after EDS injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…4), containing no detectable testosterone (Fig. 5 ) , and with no other obvious testicular effects of the EDS (Morris, 1985;Verhoeven et al, 1989); however, after about 10-12 days the Leydig cells begin to regenerate and by 42 days are restored in normal num-The Spermatogenic Cycle Fig. I .…”
Section: Testosterone and Spermatogenesismentioning
confidence: 96%