2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-55010-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liberal Preferences as an Explanation for Technology Choices. The Case of Military Robots as a Solution to the West’s Casualty Aversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the use of robotic technology in the future, the need for the current number of soldiers on the battlefield can decrease. This can lead to the reduction of combat casualties, which is very desirable from a political point of view, as stated by Hall and Coyne [18], Schörnig [23] or Horowitz and Fuhrmann [20].…”
Section: Research and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the use of robotic technology in the future, the need for the current number of soldiers on the battlefield can decrease. This can lead to the reduction of combat casualties, which is very desirable from a political point of view, as stated by Hall and Coyne [18], Schörnig [23] or Horowitz and Fuhrmann [20].…”
Section: Research and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more expensive human labour, the stronger the incentives to use the robots are expected, and at the same time the substitution of labour by capital will contribute to the protection of human life. Hall and Coyne [18], Lynn and McNerney [8], Schörnig [23], also Horowitz and Fuhrmann [20] believe that the size of the military robotics market and its development are significant factors in the military robotics proliferation. Hall and Coyne [18] further demonstrate the tendencies of the most important market representatives to influence the size of military investment expenditure to their advantage.…”
Section: Research and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation