1981
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(81)90098-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Libido and mating behavior in bulls, boars and rams. A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
35
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced libido scores recorded for the goats treated with MSG in this study may have been due to their lowered serum levels of testosterone (Chenoweth 1981), as all other parameters and factors apart from MSG doses and routes of administration were equally applicable to all. The finding of reduced libido in the WAD bucks treated with MSG in this study tends to validate the traditional or folkloric use of MSG by the Nigerian Fulani animal growers in "knocking out libido" and castration of bucks (Igwebuike et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The reduced libido scores recorded for the goats treated with MSG in this study may have been due to their lowered serum levels of testosterone (Chenoweth 1981), as all other parameters and factors apart from MSG doses and routes of administration were equally applicable to all. The finding of reduced libido in the WAD bucks treated with MSG in this study tends to validate the traditional or folkloric use of MSG by the Nigerian Fulani animal growers in "knocking out libido" and castration of bucks (Igwebuike et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The real reproductive ability of males can be indirectly determined by libido, which is the degree of interest of the male to copulate (Chenoweth, 1981). According to the classification of Chemineau et al (1991), for small ruminants, libido can be evaluated by reaction time (seconds).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst Galal et al (1978) with seasonal studying on Merino, Ossimi and their crosses stated that relationship between semen quality and libido is not clear across breeding groups. This incoherence in results of different probers may be due to various methods of testing libido, such as the latency for males to copulate, or reaction time (Chenoweth, 1981;Landaeta-Hernandez et al, 2001) counts and durations of interest, such as sniffing at the vulva and time spent with females ) the number of mounts and/or serves during a specified period of time (Landaeta-Hernandez et al, 2001;Bertram et al, 2002), and scores assigned according to various combinations of these measures (Chenoweth, 1981;LandaetaHernandez et al 2001). On the other hand, sexual activity of males is influenced by the test conditions and the methods applied in tests can vary considerably, even within the same experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%