2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2823221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Licensing and Price Competition in Tied-Goods Markets: An Application to the Single-Serve Coffee System Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The own‐price elasticity estimates of traditional auto‐drip brew coffee products in this paper tend to be slightly smaller in magnitude compared to analogous estimates obtained in some studies: Krishnamurthi and Raj (1991) (3.6–8.2); Broda and Weinstein (2006) (3.1); Foster et al (2008) (3.65); Villas‐Boas (2007b) (5.6–6.8); and Nakamura and Zerom (2010) (3.96). Chintagunta et al (2018) provide an own‐price elasticity estimate of 3.6 in absolute magnitude for single‐cup brew coffee products in coffee markets in Portugal; and Ellickson et al (2018) report their own‐price elasticity estimate for single‐cup products of 2.89 in absolute value. Both estimates are within the range of our estimated own‐price elasticities for single‐cup coffee products in US markets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The own‐price elasticity estimates of traditional auto‐drip brew coffee products in this paper tend to be slightly smaller in magnitude compared to analogous estimates obtained in some studies: Krishnamurthi and Raj (1991) (3.6–8.2); Broda and Weinstein (2006) (3.1); Foster et al (2008) (3.65); Villas‐Boas (2007b) (5.6–6.8); and Nakamura and Zerom (2010) (3.96). Chintagunta et al (2018) provide an own‐price elasticity estimate of 3.6 in absolute magnitude for single‐cup brew coffee products in coffee markets in Portugal; and Ellickson et al (2018) report their own‐price elasticity estimate for single‐cup products of 2.89 in absolute value. Both estimates are within the range of our estimated own‐price elasticities for single‐cup coffee products in US markets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, our paper is also related to the coffee literature, among which only a few have studied the relatively new single-cup coffee segment, for example, Chintagunta et al (2018), Kong et al (2016), Lin (2017), and Ellickson et al (2018). Different from previous coffee papers either on auto-drip (ground) coffee or the single-cup system, we examine the interrelationship of the two segments.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is computationally demanding as it requires the numerical solution to a dynamic programming problem with cardinality K N . 10 One possible solution to the curse of dimensionality is to impose restrictions on the primitives, (a it ; s) and q(s 0 ; s; ). Anonymity and symmetry allow the problem to be formulated in a smaller set of industry states (Ericson and Pakes, 1995;Doraszelski and Satterthwaite, 2010).…”
Section: Dimensionality Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where M is the market size. The market share of hotel i ( i ) is a function of (s i ; s i ) and solves the system of equations [10] and [11]. The industry transition when …rm i chooses action a i , and the competitors adopt strategies i is q(s 0 ; s; a i; i ).…”
Section: Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%