Forest Canopies 2004
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012457553-0/50013-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lichens and Bryophytes in Forest Canopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
52
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
2
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both physiological data (Gauslaa and Solhaug, 2000) and distributional data at multiple spatial scales (McCune, 1993;Goward and Arsenault, 2000;Sillett and Antoine, 2004) have shown that epiphytic cyanolichens tend to be dependent on high moisture conditions, and intolerant of high light conditions. Thus, forest harvesting is likely to affect the cyanolichen communities of the inland rainforest indirectly by forest fragmentation, as well as directly by removal of their substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both physiological data (Gauslaa and Solhaug, 2000) and distributional data at multiple spatial scales (McCune, 1993;Goward and Arsenault, 2000;Sillett and Antoine, 2004) have shown that epiphytic cyanolichens tend to be dependent on high moisture conditions, and intolerant of high light conditions. Thus, forest harvesting is likely to affect the cyanolichen communities of the inland rainforest indirectly by forest fragmentation, as well as directly by removal of their substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Distributional data at multiple spatial scales have shown that cyanolichens are less tolerant of desiccation than chlorolichens (containing only green-algal photobionts) (Sillett and Antoine, 2004). In British Columbia, cyanolichen diversity on conifer branches increases along a gradient of increasing summer precipitation (Goward and Arsenault, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Key factors at a tree scale include tree species, canopy height, branch size, tree age, and nutrient availability (Esseen et al 1996;Ellis 2012). Important stand factors include horizontal and vertical distributions of the canopy, stand age, and microclimate (Coxson and Coyle 2003;Sillett and Antoine 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%