2017
DOI: 10.3390/atmos8010009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lidar and Ceilometer Observations and Comparisons of Atmospheric Cloud Structure at Nagqu of Tibetan Plateau in 2014 Summer

Abstract: Abstract:In the project of the Third Tibetan Plateau Experiment of Atmospheric Science (TIPEX III), the intensive observation of cloud and precipitation in Nagqu was conducted from 1 July to 31 August 2014. The CL31 ceilometer and a WAter vapor, Cloud and Aerosol Lidar (WACAL) were deployed and focused on studying the cloud macroscopic characteristics and vertical distribution. The statistical result of CL31 ceilometer in continuous operation mode shows that the cloud occurrence is about 81% with a majority of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the temperature dependences of the optical and geometrical properties of cirrus, the simultaneous observations by WACAL and radiosonde are operated. Referring to the results measured by the co-located ceilometer of VAISALA CL31, the high clouds including cirrus occurred almost at nighttime and before dawn, especially the period beteen 18:00 UTC and 22:00 UTC (Song et al, 2017). Such a temporal distribution of the cirrus clouds is more conducive to the joint observations by the WACAL and radiosonde sounding.…”
Section: Tipex III Campaignmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To investigate the temperature dependences of the optical and geometrical properties of cirrus, the simultaneous observations by WACAL and radiosonde are operated. Referring to the results measured by the co-located ceilometer of VAISALA CL31, the high clouds including cirrus occurred almost at nighttime and before dawn, especially the period beteen 18:00 UTC and 22:00 UTC (Song et al, 2017). Such a temporal distribution of the cirrus clouds is more conducive to the joint observations by the WACAL and radiosonde sounding.…”
Section: Tipex III Campaignmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…By this algorithm, cloud layers apparent in the return signal are identified. However, if the lower clouds were too thick to be penetrated, the higher clouds will not be detected and cannot be identified (Wu et al, 2015, Song et al, 2017. During this campaign, the cloud base heights determined by the WACAL and that from the co-located VAISALA CL31 ceilometer measurements were compared and the results were reported by Song et 5 al.…”
Section: Extraction Of the Cloud Base And Top Heightsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Wu et al (2016) and Zhai et al (2017) have given a comprehensive description of CDL. The lidar has a semi-conductor single frequency seed laser that provides both the local oscillator reference beam for 25 heterodyne detection as well as the transmitted beam.…”
Section: Lidar Technology and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that the wind profile from lidar and radiosonde should be interpolated to the common height grid before comparison because of different spatial resolutions. The type of radiosonde is Model GTS1 digital radiosonde, the basic parameters of which are listed in Table 2 (Song et al, 2017). through the measurement altitude, but slightly southeasterly below 1.6 km , and then shifts to southwesterly above 1.6 km .…”
Section: Horizontal Wind Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal resolution of radial velocity is 0.5 s and the lidar results (black curves) averaged over at least 10 min after the launch of the radiosonde are compared with the radiosonde data (red curves). The type of radiosonde is Model GTS1 digital radiosonde with the basic parameters listed in Table 3 (Song et al, 2017). Figure 5 shows the horizontal wind profile during anchored measurement (mean ship speed equals to 0.27 ms −1 ) Fig.…”
Section: Horizontal Wind Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%