Lie detection with contingent negative variation

Fang, Fang; Liu, Yitao; Shen, Zheng

doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00170-3

Cited by 29 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In line with our hypothesis and earlier research Fang et al, 2003;Sun et al, 2011), the analysis of the CNV revealed a marginally significant effect with a more negative CNV for lying compared to truth telling. However, in contrast to earlier studies, the effect was restricted to Fz and only of small to medium size (d = 0.44, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.90]).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Based on earlier results, the CNV was proposed as a "new indicator for lie detection" (Fang et al, 2003). Yet, our results strongly indicate that effect sizes and even the direction of ERP deception effects seem to vary as a function of design and task characteristics and that such applied claims are premature.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 52%

“…Evidence so far is mixed. For instance, whereas the majority of research found larger CNVs for lying compared to truth telling Fang et al, 2003;Sun et al, 2011), Panasiti et al (2014 found the opposite effect in a design in which participants freely choose whether to lie or tell the truth to maximize financial gain. In this study, the Bereitschaftspotential (BP), which is an ERP component similar to the CNV, was larger for truth telling compared to lying.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Using different paradigms and stimuli, three deception studies found an enhanced CNV for lying compared to truth telling Fang et al, 2003;Sun et al, 2011). In the study by Fang et al (2003), participants were instructed to deceptively deny knowledge of familiar target faces, and to truthfully admit knowledge of other familiar faces and deny knowledge of unknown faces.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the study by Fang et al (2003), participants were instructed to deceptively deny knowledge of familiar target faces, and to truthfully admit knowledge of other familiar faces and deny knowledge of unknown faces. In the study by Sun et al (2011), participants chose for their own financial gain whether to truthfully or deceptively evaluate banknotes as genuine.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The cognitive mechanisms underlying deception: An event-related potential study

Suchotzki

Crombez

Smulders

et al. 2015

International Journal of Psychophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The cognitive view on deception proposes that lying comes with a cognitive cost. This view is supported by the finding that lying typically takes longer than truth telling. Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide a means to unravel the cognitive processes underlying this cost.Using a mock-crime design, the current study (n = 20) investigated the effects of deception on the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV), the Lateralized Readiness Potential (LRP), the Correct Response Negativity (CRN), and the stimulus-locked N200 and P300 components. In line with previous research, lying resulted in more errors, longer reaction times (RTs) and longer RT standard deviations compared to truthful responses. A marginally significant effect suggested a stronger CNV for the anticipation of lying compared to the anticipation of truth telling. There were no significant deception effects on the stimulus-and the response-locked LRPs. Unexpectedly, we found a significantly larger CRN for truth telling compared to lying.Additional analyses revealed an enhanced N200 and a decreased P300 for lying compared to truth telling. Our results support the cognitive load hypothesis for lying, yet are mixed regarding the response conflict hypothesis. Results are discussed with regard to the specific characteristics of our design and their theoretical and applied implications.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 52%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The cognitive mechanisms underlying deception: An event-related potential study

Suchotzki

Crombez

Smulders

et al. 2015

International Journal of Psychophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Employing Polygraph Assessment

Iacono,

Patrick

2013

The Handbook of Forensic Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Advances in Physiological Computing

Fairclough¹,

Gilleade²

2014

Human–Computer Interaction Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

HCI is a multidisciplinary field focused on human aspects of the development of computer technology. As computer-based technology becomes increasingly pervasive-not just in developed countries, but worldwide-the need to take a human-centered approach in the design and development of this technology becomes ever more important. For roughly 30 years now, researchers and practitioners in computational and behavioral sciences have worked to identify theory and practice that influences the direction of these technologies, and this diverse work makes up the field of human-computer interaction. Broadly speaking it includes the study of what technology might be able to do for people and how people might interact with the technology. The HCI series publishes books that advance the science and technology of developing systems which are both effective and satisfying for people in a wide variety of contexts. Titles focus on theoretical perspectives (such as formal approaches drawn from a variety of behavioral sciences), practical approaches (such as the techniques for effectively integrating user needs in system development), and social issues (such as the determinants of utility, usability and acceptability).

show abstract

Lie detection with contingent negative variation

Cited by 29 publications

References 18 publications

The cognitive mechanisms underlying deception: An event-related potential study

The cognitive mechanisms underlying deception: An event-related potential study

Employing Polygraph Assessment

Advances in Physiological Computing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About