2018
DOI: 10.1515/zsr-2018-0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lieber krank und arbeitslos als „nur“ arbeitslos? Die Auswirkungen der Medikalisierung von arbeitslosen Personen auf Stigmatisierungsprozesse

Abstract: Die Integration von (langzeit-)arbeitslosen Personen ist eine zentrale Herausforderung für Arbeitsmarkt- und Sozialpolitik. Aktivierung und die damit verknüpfte Konditionalität von Sozialleistungen haben bedeutende Implikationen für die Wahrnehmung von arbeitslosen Personen, die immer häufiger Stigmatisierungen erleben. Gesundheitliche Einschränkungen oder Behinderungen, die als einziger Grund für die Anerkennung einer (befristet) eingeschränkten Beschäftigungsfähigkeit gelten und eine Verknüpfung von Sozialle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could either be due to the low number of cases in the pretest (N = 104) or the fact that distinct factors are difficult to measure within the stigmatization framework. Therefore, and in line with Gurr et al (2018) and Linden et al (2018) we use a sum score for our analyses.…”
Section: Data and Operationalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could either be due to the low number of cases in the pretest (N = 104) or the fact that distinct factors are difficult to measure within the stigmatization framework. Therefore, and in line with Gurr et al (2018) and Linden et al (2018) we use a sum score for our analyses.…”
Section: Data and Operationalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar, but with a stronger focus on job search requirements, Hirseland and Ramos Lobato (2014) found that the unemployed react to stigmatizing media discourse ("lazy unemployed") by either taking over the public opinion, by seeing themselves as an exception to the rule or by complying with the public demands for intensified job search effort. Research using the same data as that used in the following analysis yielded the following results: Lang and Gross (2017) find that unemployment stigma consciousness is determined by the strength of deviation, the scope of the norm's application and the intensity of formal social control; Gurr et al (2018) find no effects of unemployment benefit sanctions on stigma consciousness; and Linden et al (2018) find that being exempted from job search requirements due to ill health does not reduce stigma consciousness among the unemployed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%