2015
DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2015.1060240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life After NHST: How to Describe Your Data Without “p-ing” Everywhere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also shows the post-minus-pre difference that reflects the degree of improvement after (vs. before) imagery within each condition. In line with recommendations by others (Valentine, Aloe, & Lau, 2015), Table 2 shows the unstandardized mean differences and the Cohen's D effect size for the differences between the three conditions on all of the variables that are also shown in Table 1. Note that D reflects the difference between the conditions, divided by the overall (pooled) standard deviation, thus providing an indication of how many standard deviations difference is observed between the conditions.…”
Section: Main Analysessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…It also shows the post-minus-pre difference that reflects the degree of improvement after (vs. before) imagery within each condition. In line with recommendations by others (Valentine, Aloe, & Lau, 2015), Table 2 shows the unstandardized mean differences and the Cohen's D effect size for the differences between the three conditions on all of the variables that are also shown in Table 1. Note that D reflects the difference between the conditions, divided by the overall (pooled) standard deviation, thus providing an indication of how many standard deviations difference is observed between the conditions.…”
Section: Main Analysessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…After watching ELH, a majority of them said they were more likely to recommend these services (93%, 89%, and 75%, respectively baseline to posttest and sustained it till the 2 week follow-up ( Figure 2). 61 An upward trend of knowledge about birth control pills and emergency contraception were evident with higher scores towards C5, even though the differences were not statistically significant. All attitude measures were high across conditions and over time, showing a stable and positive tendency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While data from HCI experiment has usually been analyzed by the NHST(Null hypothesis significance testing) in the past, we choose to report our results using estimation techniques with effect sizes and confidence intervals instead, as recommended by the APA [Van09] and also because the former approach is being increasingly criticized by statisticians [Lai10, Cum12, Cum13, Cum14, VAL15, Bak16], stats practitioners [AKNR17], and HCI researchers [DCH14, Dra16, BD17, BD19]. While dichotomous interpretations based on p ‐values are still extensively used [BD19], approaches relying on effect sizes and more nuanced interpretations are now widely recommended [Cum12, Cum13, Cum14, VAL15, Dra16, BD19]. However, it is still possible to read our results based on p ‐value by comparing CIs spacing with common p ‐value spacing [KA13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%