Perspectives on Stress and Stress-Related Topics 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-69057-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life Change and Illness Studies: Past History and Future Directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…21 The original scale includes 43 stressful life events (eg, “death of spouse,” “dismissal from work,” “change in frequency of arguments”). Although the scale has been widely used, it does not account for individual perceptions of stressful events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The original scale includes 43 stressful life events (eg, “death of spouse,” “dismissal from work,” “change in frequency of arguments”). Although the scale has been widely used, it does not account for individual perceptions of stressful events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Rahe and Arthur's (1978) Social Readjustment Scale (SRRS), a measure of the cumulative amount of stress to which an individual has been exposed over a period of time, may be a possible substitute. We were trying to develop a measure that would be both easy to use and would not constitute a questionnaire in and of itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this classification, two standard questionnaires were used; a) Holmes and Rahe stress scale [18], [19], [20] which scored the major life change units and thus gives an indication of risk of illness, mental or physical faced by a person based on stress, b) Hari's Stress Inventory [21] which accounted for daily hassles that may disturb a person over acute scale. This part in later stages was excluded from the final questionnaire since quantification done by the two scales was not very accurate and there were certain flaws in the scoring and basic design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%