2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02978850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment of fuel cell vehicles a methodology example of input data treatment for future technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of available approaches for uncertainty analysis in the LCIA phase were reviewed by Björklund (2002); amongst them, Monte Carlo simulation was the most commonly recommended, and specific methodologies have been developed (Contadini et al, 2002, Ciroth et al, 2004, Hung and Ma, 2009). Moreover, Monte Carlo simulation has been built into some commercial LCA software such as SimaPro (PRéConsultants, 2004b) and applied in LCAs (Miller et al, 2006, Basset-Mens et al, 2009, Spatari et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introduction 84mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A range of available approaches for uncertainty analysis in the LCIA phase were reviewed by Björklund (2002); amongst them, Monte Carlo simulation was the most commonly recommended, and specific methodologies have been developed (Contadini et al, 2002, Ciroth et al, 2004, Hung and Ma, 2009). Moreover, Monte Carlo simulation has been built into some commercial LCA software such as SimaPro (PRéConsultants, 2004b) and applied in LCAs (Miller et al, 2006, Basset-Mens et al, 2009, Spatari et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introduction 84mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the LCI uncertainty information, a range of uncertainty analysis methods can also be applied at the LCIA phase (Björklund, 2002). As one of the most commonly recommended methods, Monte Carlo simulation has been applied in previous LCAs both in methodology development and in case studies (Contadini et al, 2002, Ciroth et al, 2004, Hung and Ma, 2009, Spatari et al, 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the main focus of uncertainty research in LCA was on technical uncertainties, often referred to as data quality uncertainties. Probability-based tools have been utilised Int J LCA 10 10 10 10 10 (5) 2005 by many authors to assess this type of uncertainty (Kennedy et al 1996, Weidema and Suhr-Wesnaes 1996, Coulon et al 1997, Finnveden and Lindfors 1998, Huijbregts 1998b, Contadini et al 2002, Huijbregts et al 2003. In the Swiss Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) database, 'ecoinvent 2000', the input data are prepared to allow for the application of Monte Carlo simulation (Frischknecht et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assessments have embraced a wide range of aspects including the systematic development of the necessary tools for life cycle assessment of fuel cell powered vehicles as demonstrated by Contadini et al. [5] who combined the Fuel Upstream Energy and Emission Model (FUEEM) with academic/manufacturer literature and the work of Pehnt [6,7], which addressed both methodological and environmental aspects with regard to Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC). In addition, such investigations have also concerned themselves with the fundamental question of fuel sources for the next generation of automotive propulsion [8,9] including various biofuels [10] as part of this holistic approach towards the environmental impact of fuel cell technologies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alkaline Fuel Cell (AFC) type fuel cells have themselves been the subject of a comprehensive LCA by Staffell and Ingram [16] who assessed the impact of including an AFC fuel cell as part of a domestic combined heat and power (CHP) system. Their results showed that production of the AFC stack is relatively insignificant when compared to the other components of the CHP system, but that the biggest environmental impact was from the sulphur dioxide (and other generated respiratory M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D 5 Overall, it was concluded that improvements to the nickel catalysts used -in terms of increased activity and longevity -and better design to ease of disassembly and recycling are key to improving environmental performance of AFC and fuel cells in general.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%