2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment of repurposed waste electric and electronic equipment in comparison with original equipment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some EEE faces a rapid depreciation of its value, most of the ICT products with high economic value have the potential for reuse, given minimal efforts for repair [41]. However, dysfunctional EEE should be checked and repaired, known as preparation of reuse (PfR), before reusing them for the exact requirement or a different purpose, known as repurposing [65]. A repair process usually involves product identification, failure diagnosis, disassembly and reassembly, and replacement of spare parts to restore working condition.…”
Section: Repair and Reusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some EEE faces a rapid depreciation of its value, most of the ICT products with high economic value have the potential for reuse, given minimal efforts for repair [41]. However, dysfunctional EEE should be checked and repaired, known as preparation of reuse (PfR), before reusing them for the exact requirement or a different purpose, known as repurposing [65]. A repair process usually involves product identification, failure diagnosis, disassembly and reassembly, and replacement of spare parts to restore working condition.…”
Section: Repair and Reusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as previously introduced, e-waste recycling can be an outstanding source of raw materials (including rare earth metals) for European economies, which traditionally lack mineral resources; interestingly, recycling processes allow for reducing both energy usage and CO 2 emissions when compared to raw ore processing [26]. The feasibility of WEEE reuse, instead, strongly depends on commercial alternatives for product application, with power consumption and life-span being major factors in the overall reuse feasibility [27]. Remarkably, not always WEEE reuse is environmentally more sustainable than recycling, especially when dealing with energy-intensive equipment (e.g., white goods), whose efficiency throughout their life-span is more impactful than the construction phase [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant life cycle assessments (LCA) have already been carried out in the context of electrical appliances [16][17][18][19][20]. Most LCA studies that consider the manufacturing of appliances at the product level [21,22] show in the best scenario which material has a high or low environmental impact, but not which component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%