2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life Cycle Assessment of waste management systems in Italian industrial areas: Case study of 1st Macrolotto of Prato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the most common LCA issues in practice are, first, the high demands on time and input data; second, the uncertainty regarding the content of some particles of the analysed LCA chain; and third, that in practice, it is not necessary to analyse the complete LCA chain, which may be debatable with respect to the abovementioned point. That last statement is supported by several works [48][49][50][51]. That logic brings us, for practical purposes, unambiguously to a deeper analysis of the selected part of the LCA chain.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Among the most common LCA issues in practice are, first, the high demands on time and input data; second, the uncertainty regarding the content of some particles of the analysed LCA chain; and third, that in practice, it is not necessary to analyse the complete LCA chain, which may be debatable with respect to the abovementioned point. That last statement is supported by several works [48][49][50][51]. That logic brings us, for practical purposes, unambiguously to a deeper analysis of the selected part of the LCA chain.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The release of heavy metals in industrial soil is magnified in the case of EAL (1.13 kgDCB-eq./fu) due to the landfill process. Other authors confirm the release of heavy metals from the landfill [43] (which are reduced when electricity production is considered) or from the incineration process [22] as the major impact for this category. When compared to published works [34], Sc0 assured a good result for this category of impact (literature values ranging from −7.64 × 10 −3 kgDCB-eq./fu to 5.77 × 10 −2 kgDCB-eq./fu).…”
Section: Ecotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Weight % A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach is a very useful tool in the evaluation of the contribution of each of the processes to the overall efficiency picture of the disposal options. Arena et al [21] and Tarantini et al [22] compared the performance of alternative solid waste management in Italy quantifying the relative advantages and disadvantages for several options, while Liu et al [23] evaluated the urban solid waste handling options in China and Menikpura et al [24] assessed the sustainability of an integrated waste management system in Thailand, all of them using LCA as a decision-support tool. Although this is a very powerful mean, aspects such as the lack of transparency or wrong methodology assumptions may lead to difficult comparisons or even deficient interpretation of the results as reviewed for municipal solid waste by Cleary [25].…”
Section: Waste Final Destinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O potencial de impacto por eutrofização acontece, sobretudo, pela elevada concentração de nitratos e amônia no lixiviado de aterro, mesmo que este seja devidamente tratado em estação de tratamento [18]. Reichert [6] afirma que a eutrofização diz respeito aos impactos potenciais relacionados à concentração excessiva de macronutrientes, principalmente de nitrogênio e fósforo.…”
Section: Potencial De Eutrofizaçãounclassified