From Thucydides' Archaeologia to Robert Louis Stevenson's Treasure Island, literary tales of swashbuckling pirates have long captured the imagination of the public. Despite this, attempts to produce an archaeology of piracy have largely been unsuccessful. This has led historians (and some archaeologists) to dismiss piracy as a phenomena that cannot be understood using archaeological methods, only historical ones. Yet, the last 10 years have seen an unprecedented spike in archaeological publications in piracy, notable examples including Persistent Piracy: Maritime Violence and State-Formation in Global Maritime Perspectives (Amirel & Muller, 2014) and X Marks the Spot: An Archaeology of Piracy (Skowronek & Ewan, 2007). So how has piracy transformed from a thema non grata in archaeology to one of the fastest developing subjects in maritime archaeology? Encompassing a series of periods, ranging from Ancient Cilicia to modern day Puntland, this paper will look at how changes in the social and academic perceptions of piracy have altered how we can perceive piracy from an archaeological perspective. Topics covered will include theoretical developments and social changes which have altered the perception of piracy. This paper will go on to review how these ideas have contributed to the creation of an archaeology of piracy characterised by seasonality, high quality goods in low socio-economic regions and a form of third party backing which allows piracy to function as a sub-group of organised crime.