1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.76.4480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetime Measurements of Superdeformed Bands in148149Gdand152Dy:Evidence for Structure-D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCK2 moments are rather constant with spin, as one would expect for a superdeformed band, while the LN ones vary somewhat more. The LN results are in good agreement with the experimental data of 17.5 ± 0.2 eb [23] whereas the SCK2 are slightly higher. In panel (c) the transition energies are shown, though both approaches provide good results as compared with the experimental data [24] the SCK2 ones are slightly better.…”
Section: Superdeformed Ground Band Of the Nucleussupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The SCK2 moments are rather constant with spin, as one would expect for a superdeformed band, while the LN ones vary somewhat more. The LN results are in good agreement with the experimental data of 17.5 ± 0.2 eb [23] whereas the SCK2 are slightly higher. In panel (c) the transition energies are shown, though both approaches provide good results as compared with the experimental data [24] the SCK2 ones are slightly better.…”
Section: Superdeformed Ground Band Of the Nucleussupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The side-feeding model discussed above is similar in form to that found appropriate in the feeding of SD bands [24], and was chosen to produce plausible mean time delays associated with the feeding of these bands. There is clearly an uncertainty associated with this model.…”
Section: Fig 3 Energies Of States Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean velocity of the recoiling nuclei was calculated as a function of time by integrating over the target and averaging over 100 reaction locations within the target. The decay of the nucleus was modeled by assuming a constant in-band Q t , and side feeding into each state was modeled by a single transition with the same lifetime as the precursor in-band state [22] and an intensity to match the observed intensity profile of the band. The fractional shifts calculated in this model for various Q t values are shown by solid curves in Fig.…”
Section: (Received 6 May 1997)mentioning
confidence: 99%