2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4073(02)00066-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifetimes and polarizabilities of low lying lithium S, P and D states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For α 1 , the percentage difference between the semi-empirical model potential result of Magnier and Aubert-Frécon [48] and ours is about 7%. The values of Ashby and van Wijngaarden [49], obtained using the semi-empirical Coulomb approximation method and the values of Zhang et al [16] obtained in the framework of a frozen core Hamiltonian with a semi-empirical model potential, are very close to each other, but they differ from our results at the levels of, respectively, 0.9% and 0.8%. The experimental results of Ashby et al [50] and the relativistic calculations of Wansbeek et al [18] are expressed in the LSJ coupling scheme, which may be converted into the LS coupling by averaging over the fine structure using a (2J + 1)-weighted sum [16].…”
Section: 2 D State: Polarizabilities and Hyperpolarizabilitiessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…For α 1 , the percentage difference between the semi-empirical model potential result of Magnier and Aubert-Frécon [48] and ours is about 7%. The values of Ashby and van Wijngaarden [49], obtained using the semi-empirical Coulomb approximation method and the values of Zhang et al [16] obtained in the framework of a frozen core Hamiltonian with a semi-empirical model potential, are very close to each other, but they differ from our results at the levels of, respectively, 0.9% and 0.8%. The experimental results of Ashby et al [50] and the relativistic calculations of Wansbeek et al [18] are expressed in the LSJ coupling scheme, which may be converted into the LS coupling by averaging over the fine structure using a (2J + 1)-weighted sum [16].…”
Section: 2 D State: Polarizabilities and Hyperpolarizabilitiessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…For the polarization of the ground state there is good agreement between our results and those from the literature. In the case of the polarizability of the first excited state, we found only one other theoretical result (Ashby & van Wijngaarden 2003), where the polarizability is calculated in the Coulomb approximation.…”
Section: R-matrix Calculationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Some of these calculations are also performed using molecular codes, at the cost of atomic symmetries [25]. The one available relativistic calculation on the excited states is carried out using a rather approximate method to include the correlation effects due to the Coulomb interaction [37]. Our calculation uses a relativistic approach which considers correlation effects to all orders in the form of CC amplitudes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These could be useful in the calculation of the dispersion coefficients of the excited states and in determining Stark shifts. So far, only a few studies have been carried out on the polarizabilities of the Li excited states [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Most of these studies use nonrelativistic theories, and we will compare those results to our relativistic calculations to assess the relevance of relativistic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%