1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01017565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lifschitz singularities for periodic operators plus random potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As there are ( j) d smaller cubes in λ L and the probability that a fixed one of them contributes an eigenvalue below α 4-1" 2 is given by (4.6) we obtain: In the general case we use the ideas from [22] in order to get the analog of (4.5). To this end consider boundary conditions of the type Η%(ω) which are defined in [22] by the help of a periodic strictly positive generalized eigenfunction h of H per .…”
Section: Jq+-hmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As there are ( j) d smaller cubes in λ L and the probability that a fixed one of them contributes an eigenvalue below α 4-1" 2 is given by (4.6) we obtain: In the general case we use the ideas from [22] in order to get the analog of (4.5). To this end consider boundary conditions of the type Η%(ω) which are defined in [22] by the help of a periodic strictly positive generalized eigenfunction h of H per .…”
Section: Jq+-hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end consider boundary conditions of the type Η%(ω) which are defined in [22] by the help of a periodic strictly positive generalized eigenfunction h of H per . In [22] it is described how to modify the proof of [17] in order to show that these operators still satisfy (4.6) above. Moreover, from Proposition 1 in [22] it follows that (4.7) is valid.…”
Section: Jq+-hmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The asymptotic behavior of the IDS N 0 (E) as E ↓ E − has been investigated in [28] - [29] in the case d = 1, and in [19] in the case d ≥ 1 and E − = inf σ(−∆ + ω − W ). Note that the proofs of the results of [28], [29], and [19], essentially rely on the non-degeneracy of E − .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymptotic behavior of the IDS N 0 (E) as E ↓ E − has been investigated in [28] - [29] in the case d = 1, and in [19] in the case d ≥ 1 and E − = inf σ(−∆ + ω − W ). Note that the proofs of the results of [28], [29], and [19], essentially rely on the non-degeneracy of E − . Later, the Lifshitz tails for the operator −∆ + V ω near the edge E − were investigated in [15] under the assumptions that d ≥ 1, E − > inf σ(−∆ + ω − W ), and that E − is non-degenerate edge in the spectrum of −∆ + ω − W ; due to the last assumption these results are conditional.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%