1990
DOI: 10.1177/014362449001100204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lift traffic analysis: Formulae for the general case

Abstract: Lift or elevator passenger traffic analysis is generally based on an up peak calculation. Various authors have considered other specific passenger flows for down peak, two-way and interfloor traffic. This paper gives formulae for the general case. The formulae are based on a Poisson approximation of passenger arrivals at a lift landing station. The probable number of stops and probable reversal floors are calculated, allowing the round-trip time, waiting interval and capacity factor to be determined. The numbe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The driving force behind the calculations and simulations as well as real elevators is the passenger arrival process which defines when and at which floors passengers arrive to register pickup requests, and what their destinations are. The theoretical calculations are based on queuing theory, and they can be used to study the performance of conventional elevator groups in up peak traffic conditions (Roschier and Kaakinen 1979, Peters 1990, Barney 2003, Al-Sharif 2010, Al-Sharif et al 2014. Other traffic situations and elevator systems based on destination control require simulation.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The driving force behind the calculations and simulations as well as real elevators is the passenger arrival process which defines when and at which floors passengers arrive to register pickup requests, and what their destinations are. The theoretical calculations are based on queuing theory, and they can be used to study the performance of conventional elevator groups in up peak traffic conditions (Roschier and Kaakinen 1979, Peters 1990, Barney 2003, Al-Sharif 2010, Al-Sharif et al 2014. Other traffic situations and elevator systems based on destination control require simulation.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general format for an OD matrix is shown in equation (4). All the diagonal elements are equal to zero, as it is assumed that passengers are rational and would not travel from a floor to the same floor.…”
Section: Od Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A building has two entrance floors (B and G) and four occupant floors (1)(2)(3)(4). The percentage ARs from the two entrances are 0.2 and 0.8 from B and G, respectively.…”
Section: Random Generation Of Passengers Using the Od Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of traffic mix conditions that are believed to be representative of the lunch-time peak traffic conditions in many modern office buildings include: 40%:40%:20% [10]; 45%:45%:10% [11]; 42%, 42%, 16% [12]; incoming, outgoing and inter-floor traffic, respectively. In addition, it is possible to calculate the round-trip time for general traffic conditions under the Poisson arrival process assumption ( [13,14]) or the plentifulpassenger-supply assumption ( [15,16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%