2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16955-7_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LiFTinG: Lightweight Freerider-Tracking in Gossip

Abstract: This paper presents LiFTinG, the first protocol to detect freeriders, including colluding ones, in gossip-based content dissemination systems with asymmetric data exchanges. LiFTinG relies on nodes tracking abnormal behaviors by cross-checking the history of their previous interactions, and exploits the fact that nodes pick neighbors at random to prevent colluding nodes from covering each other up.We present extensive analytical evaluations of LiFTinG, backed up by simulations and PlanetLab experiments. In a 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we used 938B updates in the previous experiments, as was done in [19], [30], Figure 8 shows that using bigger updates can further decrease the bandwidth consumption of PAG. This is due to the fact that more content can be represented under each hash.…”
Section: B Comparisons With Existing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we used 938B updates in the previous experiments, as was done in [19], [30], Figure 8 shows that using bigger updates can further decrease the bandwidth consumption of PAG. This is due to the fact that more content can be represented under each hash.…”
Section: B Comparisons With Existing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, peers are not forced to initiate exchanges. Differently, LiFTinG [30] uses audits to control that nodes forward the updates they receive. However, it relies on statistical prop- Anonymous communications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of solutions have been proposed to deal with selfishness in P2P systems [1], [2], [3], [17], [24], [25]. Most of these solutions rely on Game Theory for modelling and reasoning about selfish behaviours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative solution to the above static approach, is to employ recent accountability mechanisms (e.g., FullReview [13], Lifting [17], and PeerReview [19]), with the goal of dynamically forcing nodes to be responsible for their actions. Noteworthy among these mechanisms is FullReview, which appears to be the only one specifically designed for dealing with selfish nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation