2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2005.07.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligand properties of N-heterocyclic and Bertrand carbenes: A density functional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated Δ N values for complexes R 2 E–Ni­(CO) 3 lie in the range from 0.006 for A-Ge-Ni to 0.173 for C-Ge-Ni (Table S9, Chart ). The value 0.122 for Ard-C corresponds well with the previous calculations. , As it could be expected, the weakest donors are A -type tetrylenes, bearing electron-withdrawing substituents. The strongest donors are tetrylenes stabilized by intramolecular coordination, C and A + C .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated Δ N values for complexes R 2 E–Ni­(CO) 3 lie in the range from 0.006 for A-Ge-Ni to 0.173 for C-Ge-Ni (Table S9, Chart ). The value 0.122 for Ard-C corresponds well with the previous calculations. , As it could be expected, the weakest donors are A -type tetrylenes, bearing electron-withdrawing substituents. The strongest donors are tetrylenes stabilized by intramolecular coordination, C and A + C .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The value 0.122 for Ard-C corresponds well with the previous calculations. 131,143 As it could be expected, the weakest donors are A-type tetrylenes, bearing electron-withdrawing substituents. The strongest donors are tetrylenes stabilized by intramolecular coordination, C and A + C. In these cases, charge transfer is larger than that for Arduengo's carbene Ard-C, known as one of the strongest neutral electron donors.…”
Section: ■ Computational Approachesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We found values for 1 and 2 to be in good agreement with previous theoretical estimations. 82,85 Charge transfer increases from 0.162 to 0.228 in the order 1a < 2a < 3a < 5a < 4a < 6a, following a parallel trend to the increasing softness of 1-6. Indeed, the influence of h on DN is more pronounced than that of c since the relative decrease of c upon changing from 1 to 6 is only 13% (30% decrease for h).…”
Section: Nhc Donor Properties: Charge Transfer In [Rhcl(nhc)(co) 2 ]mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As mentioned above, experimental and computational studies have sought to compare the electronic properties of carbenes to a variety of ligands by determination of carbonyl stretching frequencies in transition metal complexes. 14-17,30,36,38,40,43, 53 We have previously used LKB descriptors to predict the Tolman electronic parameter (TEP) 35,47,48 for P-donor ligands. 1, 3 The limited availability of data for carbene ligands covered by this work (7-10 ligands) 38,40 prevents the derivation of predictive linear regression models.…”
Section: Analysis (1) Individual Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%