2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06981-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-absorbing organic carbon from prescribed and laboratory biomass burning and gasoline vehicle emissions

Abstract: Light-absorbing organic carbon (OC), also termed brown carbon (BrC), from laboratory-based biomass burning (BB) has been studied intensively to understand the contribution of BB to radiative forcing. However, relatively few measurements have been conducted on field-based BB and even fewer measurements have examined BrC from anthropogenic combustion sources like motor vehicle emissions. In this work, the light absorption of methanol-extractable OC from prescribed and laboratory BB and gasoline vehicle emissions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
146
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
23
146
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3 shows the normalized absorbance for polar and non-polar extracts of fresh and aged BB aerosols. While most previous studies have focused on light absorption by the watersoluble fraction of BB aerosols (Hecobian et al, 2010;Xie et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2013b), very little attention was given to the light absorption by the water-insoluble part of BB aerosols (Chen and Bond,10 2010) Our results suggest that for fresh aerosols from all fuels except for Siberian peat, non-polar (hexane) extracts absorb more than polar (water) extracts (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…3 shows the normalized absorbance for polar and non-polar extracts of fresh and aged BB aerosols. While most previous studies have focused on light absorption by the watersoluble fraction of BB aerosols (Hecobian et al, 2010;Xie et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2013b), very little attention was given to the light absorption by the water-insoluble part of BB aerosols (Chen and Bond,10 2010) Our results suggest that for fresh aerosols from all fuels except for Siberian peat, non-polar (hexane) extracts absorb more than polar (water) extracts (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…On the other hand, r liq.fossil of 0.85 ± 0.16 was applied without considering its seasonal variations. However, it is found that r liq.fossil is lower in summer compared with other seasons, which is related to increased volatilization of semivolatile organic compounds and faster catalyst and engine warm-up times in summer (Xie et al, 2017). X. H. H. found OC/EC ratios from fresh vehicular emissions in summer to be ∼ 80 % of the yearly average, based on the lowest 5 % OC/EC ratios measured in a roadside environment in Hongkong, China.…”
Section: Differences Between Observed and Estimated Primary Oc Concenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows the normalized absorbance for polar and non-polar extracts of fresh and aged BB aerosols. While most previous studies have focused on light absorption by the water-soluble fraction of BB aerosols (Hecobian et al, 2010;Xie et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2013), very little attention has been given to the light absorption by the water-insoluble part of BB aerosols (Chen and Bond, 2010). Our results demonstrate that for fresh aerosols from all fuels, non-polar (hexane) extracts absorb more than polar (water) extracts (Fig.…”
Section: Absorbance Of Polar and Non-polar Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%