2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light and competition alter leaf stoichiometry of introduced species and native mangrove species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the leaf stoichiometry of P. fruticosa at high elevations on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP) remains relatively undocumented. Leaf stoichiometry can reflect the balance and limitations in the uptake of plant macronutrients (C, N, P) that influence plants’ growth rate and life history strategies ( Baxter and Dilkes, 2012 ; Zhu et al, 2020 ) and global C, N, P biogeochemical cycles ( Moe et al, 2005 ; Liu et al, 2018 ). Leaf stoichiometry information is critical developing an understanding of nutrient cycling processes, in developing biogeochemical models, and in predicting plant responses to global climate change ( Zhao et al, 2014 , 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the leaf stoichiometry of P. fruticosa at high elevations on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP) remains relatively undocumented. Leaf stoichiometry can reflect the balance and limitations in the uptake of plant macronutrients (C, N, P) that influence plants’ growth rate and life history strategies ( Baxter and Dilkes, 2012 ; Zhu et al, 2020 ) and global C, N, P biogeochemical cycles ( Moe et al, 2005 ; Liu et al, 2018 ). Leaf stoichiometry information is critical developing an understanding of nutrient cycling processes, in developing biogeochemical models, and in predicting plant responses to global climate change ( Zhao et al, 2014 , 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecological stoichiometry focuses on the balance of multiple elements in ecological interactions and processes, such as energy flow and nutrient cycling, and has become an important topic of research in recent years in ecology and biology (Moe et al, 2005 ; Sistla and Schimel, 2012 ; Yang et al, 2019 ; Zhu et al, 2020 ). It is an important tool to reveal organisms' responses to external disturbances and nutrient supply balance mechanisms in ecosystems (Zeng et al, 2016 ), mainly by analyzing changes in carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) (Cao et al, 2020 ), which are well-known as basic elements constituting plants and are closely linked to plant photosynthesis, respiration, and various ecosystem functions (Elser et al, 2010 ; Marschner and Marschner, 2012 ; Wang et al, 2015 ; Yan et al, 2016 ; Croft et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaves are the most active and primary photosynthetic plant organ (Elser et al, 2010 ; Yang et al, 2019 ), their size and structure exhibit a tradeoff between the support cost and photosynthetic returns during plant adaptation to environmental changes (Shi et al, 2020 , 2022 ; Guo et al, 2021 ; Li et al, 2022a , b ), and leaf stoichiometry can reflect the tradeoff formed in this evolution from the angle of leaf chemical elements and its spatio-temporal variations (Baxter and Dilkes, 2012 ; Cao et al, 2020 ; Zhu et al, 2020 ). Leaf C/N and C/P were widely accepted as effective indicators of plants' N and P use efficiency and growth rate, and their lower values indicated lower nutrient utilization efficiency and higher plant growth (Weidner et al, 2015 ; Sun et al, 2017 ; Cao et al, 2020 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study revealed significant differences associated with species traits with respect to the fine root dynamics (live fine root biomass, fine root necromass, productivity, turnover rate and decomposition rate) as well as soil organic carbon content. In this study, SA had lower fine root mass and productivity due to the intensive demand for light and fast-growing characteristics of S. apetala (Chen et al, 2012;Zhu et al, 2020), with significantly stronger self-thinning effect compared with the K. obovata plantation. Combining with its higher fine root turnover and decomposition rates, fine roots of S. apetala may have a lower contribution to soil organic carbon accumulation than those of K. obovata, as the balance between productivity and decomposition of fine roots in the anoxic environment crucially determines the belowground carbon storage in mangrove soils.…”
Section: Implications Of Species Traits For Carbon-based Mangrove Aff...mentioning
confidence: 74%