2010
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-at-night, cancer and aging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Global co-distribution of light at night and cancers of breast, prostate and some others was demonstrated in humans. [8][9][10] Constant illumination probably exerts its detrimental effects on health, tumorigenesis as well as survival via disturbances of the female reproductive cycle. 11 The mechanisms involved can be assumed to include the pineal hormone the effect of the constant illumination on the development of spontaneous tumors in female 129/Sv mice was investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Global co-distribution of light at night and cancers of breast, prostate and some others was demonstrated in humans. [8][9][10] Constant illumination probably exerts its detrimental effects on health, tumorigenesis as well as survival via disturbances of the female reproductive cycle. 11 The mechanisms involved can be assumed to include the pineal hormone the effect of the constant illumination on the development of spontaneous tumors in female 129/Sv mice was investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing evidence suggests that the presence of constant light can disrupt many aspects of circadian rhythm and have negative effects on physiology. In vertebrates, including humans, such physiological effects of constant exposure to light include disruptions to juvenile growth ( Bruning, Hölker & Wolter, 2011 ), accelerated aging ( Vinogradova et al, 2009 ; Bartsch, 2010 ), increased depression and anxiety ( Ma et al, 2007 ; Fonken et al, 2009 ), an increased risk of cancer ( Blask et al, 2003 ; Anisimov et al, 2004 ; Anisimov, 2006 ; Haim & Zubidat, 2015 ) and generally a negative impact on immune function ( Maestroni, Conti & Pierpaoli, 1986 ; Moore & Siopes, 2000 ; Oishi et al, 2006 ). The absence of a circadian cue is likely to be a strong driver behind these effects; however, similar effects are evident in response to an extension in the number of hours of light exposure ( Megdal et al, 2005 ; Blask, 2009 ; Stevens, 2009 ; Dickerman & Liu, 2012 ) or exposure to dim light during periods of natural darkness ( Kloog et al, 2010 ; Spivey, 2010 ; Bedrosian et al, 2011 ; Aubrecht, Weil & Nelson, 2014 ; Borniger et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%