2017 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/mmsp.2017.8122232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light field denoising by sparse 5D transform domain collaborative filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess the denoising performance of the 4D anisotropic diffusion with the proposed model on real light fields, in comparison with state of the art methods, e.g., with [2], we considered the same 12 light fields of the EPFL dataset [33]. The light fields have been extracted from the raw captures using Dansereau's Matlab light field toolbox [34] in the same conditions as in [2].…”
Section: Denoising Results With Real Light Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to assess the denoising performance of the 4D anisotropic diffusion with the proposed model on real light fields, in comparison with state of the art methods, e.g., with [2], we considered the same 12 light fields of the EPFL dataset [33]. The light fields have been extracted from the raw captures using Dansereau's Matlab light field toolbox [34] in the same conditions as in [2].…”
Section: Denoising Results With Real Light Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led us to introduce a novel denoising method that we called Anisotropic Diffusion Denoising 4D (ADD4D). Denoising results show that the proposed method compares well to the best state of the art method [2], even outperforming it at high noise levels, while being considerably faster. Preliminary light field denoising results with ADD4D have been presented in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five methods were chosen for comparison: the classic 2D image denoiser BM3D [13], which denoises each SAI inde- pendently; the video denoiser V-BM4D [14], which considers the LF SAIs as a video sequence, and its variation V-BM4D-EPI [15] that works on the EPI sequence; the LF denoiser HyperFan4D [18], which works on the 4D frequency space of the LF; and LFBM5D [19], which extends the BM3D model into a 5D framework. Two baseline methods were used for evaluation: Avg-All, which angularly replicates X avg to reconstruct the entire LF; APA-syn, which uses L syn from the syn-Net as denoising output.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus propose to apply denoising as a final step. For that purpose, we use the state-of-the art LFBM5D filter introduced in [22]. This filter takes full advantage of the 4D nature of light fields by creating disparity compensated 4D patches which are then stacked together with similar 4D patches along a 5 th dimension.…”
Section: Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%