2012
DOI: 10.1002/adem.201200217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light‐Metal Foams—History of Innovation and Technological Challenges

Abstract: The history of metallic foams and the key innovations that have led to the variety of processing methods known today are reviewed. It is evident that the idea of foaming metals is very old and that most of the techniques used today have been proposed already in the 1950s. The most important milestones in the development of foaming technologies and the some of the attempts to commercialize metal foams are reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
163
0
16

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
2
163
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Contact angle measured for Al 3 Ti by sessile drop method decreases as holding time increases and, then, arrives stable equilibrium value (θ = 99 ) at holding time about 10 min and longer, as can be seen in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Wetting Behaviour Of Solids In Contact With Liquid Almentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Contact angle measured for Al 3 Ti by sessile drop method decreases as holding time increases and, then, arrives stable equilibrium value (θ = 99 ) at holding time about 10 min and longer, as can be seen in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Wetting Behaviour Of Solids In Contact With Liquid Almentioning
confidence: 63%
“…After this the above foams runs out the expansion and, then, decay gradually with increasing the temperature up to 700 C although release of hydrogen from TiH 2 was still in progress. 6,8) Unlike the above both carbonate kind of foam of ZAM alloy (4) and that of Al added with complex foaming agent (2) continue to expand up to the maximum values as the temperature increases up to 700 C. Finally, maximum expansion of the foams created by CaCO 3 foaming agent (2,4) is rather high in comparison with those indicative of hydride kind of foams (1,3). Moreover, the foams (2,4) keep maximum expansion for about 200 s and longer whereas hydride kind of foams (1,3) keep maximum height less than for 50 s.…”
Section: Foam Formation and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comprehensive details of distinctive features required for compres- 4) energy absorption up to densification, 5) calculated over theoretical relations [9] the same as it was fulfilled previously [13,14]. sion tests of porous Al and Al foams was done on the base of newly developed Standard ISO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%