2013
DOI: 10.1121/1.4831383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightning characterization through acoustic measurements

Abstract: Table des matières 4.7.2 Capacité des mesures acoustiques à reconstruire les parties des décharges de faible altitude .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acoustic reconstructions turned out even better in the lower part of the lightning channel, when the acoustic station is in the vicinity of the flash (less than 20 km). In particular, atmospheric effects are neglected, and sound propagation is assumed straight line in a homogeneous atmosphere at the constant temperature (Gallin, , Chapter 4, Figure 4.2) measured on the ground, so that the reference sound speed is c 0 =340 m/s. Ray tracing methods including realistic atmospheric profiles of temperature and velocity did not show a significant improvement in this particular case (see Gallin et al, , appendix B) and even provided a poorer quality result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic reconstructions turned out even better in the lower part of the lightning channel, when the acoustic station is in the vicinity of the flash (less than 20 km). In particular, atmospheric effects are neglected, and sound propagation is assumed straight line in a homogeneous atmosphere at the constant temperature (Gallin, , Chapter 4, Figure 4.2) measured on the ground, so that the reference sound speed is c 0 =340 m/s. Ray tracing methods including realistic atmospheric profiles of temperature and velocity did not show a significant improvement in this particular case (see Gallin et al, , appendix B) and even provided a poorer quality result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the complexity of the physics to be taken into account, numerical simulations of atmospheric propagation have necessarily been based on simplified approaches. Ray tracing (Rogers & Gardner 1980;Lonzaga et al 2015;Sabatini et al 2016b;Scott, Blanc-Benon & Gainville 2017), normal modes (Waxler 2002(Waxler , 2004Bertin, Millet & Bouche 2014; and oneway models (Lingevitch, Collins & Siegmann 1999;Ostashev et al 2001;Le Pichon, Ceranna & Vergoz 2012;Gallin et al 2014) have been the most commonly used techniques. Albeit computationally efficient, they are not able to account for all the aforementioned physical phenomena.…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Of Infrasound Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing sonic boom propagation models that account for turbulence effects [11][12][13][14][15][16] are either based on the nonlinear KZK parabolic equation [17][18][19] or the nonlinear FLHOWARD equation. 20,21 These models are one-way propagation models and were, thus, formulated to only account for diffracted signals but not backscattered signals. 20 As with electromagnetic waves, the random fluctuation in a turbulence field does not only lead to acoustic forward scattering but also backscattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%