2001
DOI: 10.1029/2001ja000067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightning‐induced energetic electron flux enhancements in the drift loss cone

Abstract: Abstract. With its relatively low altitude (520 x 670 km) orbit, SAMPEX is mostly below the stable trapping region where charged particles repeatedly drift around the Earth, especially at midlatitudes. Recent analyses of SAMPEX data have revealed a surprisingly common set of observations of enhanced energetic (>150 keV) electron fluxes at L < 3, during times when SAMPEX was located such that any electrons that it observed were in the drift loss cone (and were thus destined to be precipitated upon reaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, during major geomagnetic storms, such as the Halloween storm in 2003, the flux of relativistic electrons in the slot region increases dramatically [Baker et al, 2004], as a result of enhanced inward transport and wave acceleration Shprits et al, 2006;Thorne et al, 2007]. The enhanced flux of relativistic electrons subsequently decay to the prestorm equilibrium levels on a timescale of days to weeks, largely due to the resonant pitch angle scattering by plasmaspheric hiss [Lyons et al, 1972;Lyons and Thorne, 1973;Albert, 1994;Thorne 1998a, 1998b], although losses due to lightning-induced electron precipitation may be important at lower energies [Voss et al, 1998;Blake et al, 2001;Rodger and Clilverd, 2002]. Farther out, pitch angle scattering by plasmaspheric hiss contributes to the loss of outer radiation belt electrons during the main and recovery phases of a storm [Summers et al, 2007] and can explain the quiet time decay of outer radiation belt electrons over a wide range of energies and L shells [e.g., Meredith et al, 2006a].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during major geomagnetic storms, such as the Halloween storm in 2003, the flux of relativistic electrons in the slot region increases dramatically [Baker et al, 2004], as a result of enhanced inward transport and wave acceleration Shprits et al, 2006;Thorne et al, 2007]. The enhanced flux of relativistic electrons subsequently decay to the prestorm equilibrium levels on a timescale of days to weeks, largely due to the resonant pitch angle scattering by plasmaspheric hiss [Lyons et al, 1972;Lyons and Thorne, 1973;Albert, 1994;Thorne 1998a, 1998b], although losses due to lightning-induced electron precipitation may be important at lower energies [Voss et al, 1998;Blake et al, 2001;Rodger and Clilverd, 2002]. Farther out, pitch angle scattering by plasmaspheric hiss contributes to the loss of outer radiation belt electrons during the main and recovery phases of a storm [Summers et al, 2007] and can explain the quiet time decay of outer radiation belt electrons over a wide range of energies and L shells [e.g., Meredith et al, 2006a].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lightning-generated whistler mode waves are also filled in the plasmasphere and have an important role in the loss processes of inner belt electrons (Blake et al, 2001;Rodger et al, 2003Rodger et al, , 2004Rodger et al, , 2007. However, it is unlikely that theses whistler mode waves always appear in the inner radiation belt during a storm as discusses in this study.…”
Section: Numerical Calculationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Therefore, observed electrons consist of electrons in the bounce loss cone, the drift loss cone, and the trapped region. Following a method of Blake et al (2001), we restrict the data in the drift loss cone and in the trapped region to geographic longitude ranging from 180 • to 280 • in the Northern Hemisphere, and from 180 • to 250 • in the Southern Hemisphere, and from 300 • to 50 • in the Southern Hemisphere (South Atlantic Anomaly). The electrons in these selected regions are almost insensitive to the anomaly of geomagnetic fields and have approximately the same inner belt flux level.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, top panel). This assumption seems reasonable, given that SAMPEX and UARS satellite data have revealed hundreds of cases where enhanced electron precipitation losses were associated with individual thunderstorms (Blake et al, 2001). As WEP originates from around the geomagnetic equator through the interaction of a whistler-wave with counter-streaming energetic electrons, one might expect the LIE to be produced only in the source lightning hemisphere.…”
Section: Global Distribution Of Trimpi Ratementioning
confidence: 99%