Lightweight MIPv6 with IPSec Support

Jara, Antonio J.; Fernández, David; López, Pablo; Zamora, Miguel A.; Skarmeta, Antonio F.

doi:10.1155/2014/563274

Cited by 21 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2014, Anotonia j et al [7] presented and analyzed the requirements and desirable features for the mobility support and Proposed efficient solution based on IPSec for mobility constraint environment. In this solution for major requirements for scalable and inter domain solution, compatibility with IPv6 existing protocols and security support based on IPSec has been considered.…”

Section: B Light Weight Mipv6 With Ipsec Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review: Security Mechanism of Mobile Ipv6 Threats against Binding Update

Barbudhe¹

2017

IJRASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last few years there is tremendous development in the area of wireless and mobile network has been observed. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) proposed Mobile IPv6 to provide mobility in wireless networks. In MIPv6, Every time when Mobile node (MN) moves, it sends binding update message to the home agent (HA) for telling its current location. However, in this case there may be chances of spoofing of a Binding update (BU)message by an attacker and pretending to be another mobile node. And then the attacker redirects all the traffic destined for the original node to another node or to itself. This paper analyzes and also compares some of the existing mechanisms that are used for reducing threats related to binding update messages in the current mobile IPv6 environment and gives the overview of this area.

show abstract

Section: B Light Weight Mipv6 With Ipsec Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review: Security Mechanism of Mobile Ipv6 Threats against Binding Update

Barbudhe¹

2017

IJRASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another recent protocol which is compatible and suitable for IoT-devices is presented by [92], called lightweight MIPv6 with IPSec support protocol. The main goal of this protocol is to present an optimal solution for dynamic ecosystems in terms of efficiency and security integrated with resource-constrained devices (IoT-devices).…”

Section: Mobility-related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobility management for IoT: a survey

Ghaleb

Subramaniam

Zukarnain

et al. 2016

J Wireless Com Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet of Thing (IoT) or also referred to as IP-enabled wireless sensor network (IP-WSN) has become a rich area of research. This is due to the rapid growth in a wide spectrum of critical application domains. However, the properties within these systems such as memory size, processing capacity, and power supply have led to imposing constraints on IP-WSN applications and its deployment in the real world. Consequently, IP-WSN is constantly faced with issues as the complexity further rises due to IP mobility. IP mobility management is utilized as a mechanism to resolve these issues. The management protocols introduced to support mobility has evolved from host-based to network-based mobility management protocols. The presence of both types of solutions is dominant but depended on the nature of systems being deployed. The mobile node (MN) is involved with the mobility-related signaling in host-based protocols, while network-based protocols shield the host by transferring the mobility-related signaling to the network entities. The features of the IoT are inclined towards the network-based solutions. The wide spectrum of strategies derived to achieve enhanced performance evidently displays superiority in performance and simultaneous issues such as long handover latency, intense signaling, and packet loss which affects the QoS for the real-time applications. This paper extensively reviews and discusses the algorithms developed to address the challenges and the techniques of integrating IP over WSNs, the attributes of mobility management within the IPv4 and IPv6, respectively, and special focus is given on a comprehensive review encompassing mechanisms, advantages, and disadvantages on related work within the IPv6 mobility management. The paper is concluded with the proposition of several pertinent open issues which are of high research value.

show abstract

“…A number of researchers had evaluated the use of IPsec to secure Mobile IPv6 such as [10], [11], and [12]. Jara et al [10] analyzed the suitability of Mobile IPv6 and IPsec for resource-constrained devices. They designed, developed, and evaluated a lightweight mechanism for the integration of Mobile IPv6 with IPsec as its security feature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing IPsec Performance in Mobile IPv6 Using Elliptic Curve Cryptography

Praptodiyono¹,

Santoso²,

Abdurrazaq³

et al. 2019

EECSI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet has become indispensable to the modern society nowadays. Due to the dynamic nature of human activities, the evolving mobile technology has played a significant role and it is reflected in the exponential growth of the number of mobile users globally. However, the characteristic of the Internet as an open network made it vulnerable to various malicious activities. To secure communication at network layer, IETF recommended IPsec as a security feature. Mobile IPv6 as the successor of the current mobile technology, Mobile IPv4, also mandated the use of IPsec. However, since IPsec is a set of security algorithm, it has several well-known weaknesses such as bootstrapping issue when generating a security association as well as complex key exchange mechanism. It is a well-known fact that IPsec has a high overhead especially when implemented on Mobile IPv6 and used on limited energy devices such as mobile devices. This paper aims to enhance the IPsec performance by substituting the existing key exchange algorithm with a lightweight elliptic curve algorithm. The experiments managed to reduce the delay of IPsec in Mobile IPv6 by 67% less than the standard implementation.

show abstract

Lightweight MIPv6 with IPSec Support

Cited by 21 publications

References 23 publications

Review: Security Mechanism of Mobile Ipv6 Threats against Binding Update

Review: Security Mechanism of Mobile Ipv6 Threats against Binding Update

Mobility management for IoT: a survey

Enhancing IPsec Performance in Mobile IPv6 Using Elliptic Curve Cryptography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About