Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BACKGROUNDFlap closure technique for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease has been conclusively shown to be effective in relieving recurrence rate in many studies, but it is expensive and difficult to perform. Purpose of this study is to find out if simple primary closure is effective in management as claimed by some authors and to determine which of the procedures is easier on the pocket for the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODSPatients were enrolled into either of the two groups-Group A-Simple primary closure. Group B-Flap closure and gluteal sulcus obliterative procedures based on their choice after explaining the type of procedure and the approximate cost involved in both. Parameters recorded and analysed by Pearson's Chi-square test for statistical significance. RESULTS95 patients were included for the study-42 in Group A and 53 in Group B. Male-to-female ratio of 5:2 and 11:4, respectively; average age of 25 in both the groups (range 15 to 40 years in group A, 16 to 41 in group B). There were 17 wound dehiscence, 2 seromas and 7 recurrences in group A and 16 wound dehiscence, 8 seromas and 2 recurrences in group B. The difference is the recurrence rate being statistically significant. 12 patients-8 with non-healing wounds and 4 with recurrences from group A joined group B while 9-6 with dehiscence and 3 recurrences were lost to follow up. Average wound healing time in the simple closure patients was 31 days, while in group B, it was 16.4 days. Average expenditure incurred by patients in primary closure group was Rs. 7,900 compared to Rs. 9,300 in group B, but if the additional expense due to crossing over to group B was added, average jumped up to Rs. 10,700, which was Rs. 1000 more than the flap closure patients. CONCLUSIONIn management of patients with chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus, even though the average cost of treatment by simple primary closure is less than that by flap closure technique, the significantly higher rate of recurrence and prolonged time to heal in case of wound dehiscence nullifies whatever pecuniary benefits they may have gained and hence flap closure is advisable especially in patients with recurrent disease.
BACKGROUNDFlap closure technique for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease has been conclusively shown to be effective in relieving recurrence rate in many studies, but it is expensive and difficult to perform. Purpose of this study is to find out if simple primary closure is effective in management as claimed by some authors and to determine which of the procedures is easier on the pocket for the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODSPatients were enrolled into either of the two groups-Group A-Simple primary closure. Group B-Flap closure and gluteal sulcus obliterative procedures based on their choice after explaining the type of procedure and the approximate cost involved in both. Parameters recorded and analysed by Pearson's Chi-square test for statistical significance. RESULTS95 patients were included for the study-42 in Group A and 53 in Group B. Male-to-female ratio of 5:2 and 11:4, respectively; average age of 25 in both the groups (range 15 to 40 years in group A, 16 to 41 in group B). There were 17 wound dehiscence, 2 seromas and 7 recurrences in group A and 16 wound dehiscence, 8 seromas and 2 recurrences in group B. The difference is the recurrence rate being statistically significant. 12 patients-8 with non-healing wounds and 4 with recurrences from group A joined group B while 9-6 with dehiscence and 3 recurrences were lost to follow up. Average wound healing time in the simple closure patients was 31 days, while in group B, it was 16.4 days. Average expenditure incurred by patients in primary closure group was Rs. 7,900 compared to Rs. 9,300 in group B, but if the additional expense due to crossing over to group B was added, average jumped up to Rs. 10,700, which was Rs. 1000 more than the flap closure patients. CONCLUSIONIn management of patients with chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus, even though the average cost of treatment by simple primary closure is less than that by flap closure technique, the significantly higher rate of recurrence and prolonged time to heal in case of wound dehiscence nullifies whatever pecuniary benefits they may have gained and hence flap closure is advisable especially in patients with recurrent disease.
Background: Natal cleft pilonidal sinus disease is known for its high recurrence rate after surgery. Different surgical procedures are being used for its treatment and these vary from wide excision followed by healing with secondary intention to excision followed by reconstruction with a flap. Limberg flap reconstruction procedure has been used by many surgeons as their primary choice owing to its low recurrence rate and less postoperative complications. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of Limberg flap reconstruction procedure in patients with primary natal cleft pilonidal sinus disease. Methods: This descriptive case series was conducted at Ghurki trust teaching hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, between January 2015 to December 2018. 110 consecutive patients with primary natal cleft pilonidal sinus disease were included in this study. Informed consent was taken from these patients and all patients underwent Limberg flap reconstruction procedure. The evaluated outcomes of this procedure included duration of hospital stay, postoperative pain, primary healing, surgical site Infection, seroma formation, flap necrosis and, recurrence. Results: The patients age ranged between 18 years to 60 years. The mean age was 26.6 ±8.6 years. 73 patients (66.36 %) were males and 23 patients (33.63%) were females. The duration of disease ranged between 1 month to 6 months with a mean of 3.7±1.7 months. The mean operating time was 47.50±5.14 minutes. The mean duration of hospital stay was 1.87±0.80 days. The mean postoperative pain score calculated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) twenty-four hours after the surgery was 3.45. 95 patients (86.36%) had complete primary healing without any complication. 9 patients (8.18%) had a surgical site infection and 6 patients (5.45 %) had seroma formation. No patient suffered from flap necrosis. 2 patients (1.81%) who had complete primary healing presented with recurrence of the disease within six months of the procedure with a period of one year of follow-up designated for every patient. Conclusion: Limberg flap reconstruction procedure is a safe and efficacious treatment option for primary natal cleft pilonidal sinus disease because it provides early complete primary healing in most patients, and shortens the duration of hospital stay thus reducing the cost of treatment. The pain scores fall in the moderate post-operative pain score category and the complication rates and the recurrence rates are very low.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.