Liming and deep ripping responses for a range of field crops

Brooke, HD; Coventry, David; Reeves, TG; Jarvis, D. K.

doi:10.1007/bf02220687

Cited by 21 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, the amounts of N and K (169 and 178 kg ha −1 , respectively) taken up by safflower were much higher than that supplied by mineral fertilization. Therefore, our results evidenced that the safflower requires relatively large amounts of nutrients, such as N, K, and Ca, as suggested by other researchers (Abbasieh et al., 2013; Brooke, Coventry, Reeves, & Jarvis, 1989; Dordas & Sioulas, 2009; El‐Mohsen & Mahmoud, 2013; Golzarfar et al., 2012; Haghighati, 2010; Sampaio et al., 2016; Soleimani, 2010). On the other hand, safflower demonstrated a great capacity to access a considerable portion of the soil profile to obtain nutrients (Haghighati, 2010; Herdrich, 2001; Montoya, 2010), especially those not supplied by mineral fertilization, even with relatively low water availability (Lovelli et al., 2007; Mohammadi et al., 2018; Montoya, 2010).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Biomass and nutrient accumulation and partitioning of fall‐winter safflower in a double‐cropping system of southeastern Brazil

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The quantification of nutrient uptake and partitioning during crop cultivation, as well as nutrients removed at harvest, are essential information to optimize nutrient management. A 2‐yr field experiment was conducted in Botucatu, São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil, to examine the biomass accumulation and nutritional requirements and removal of two safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes cultivated in the fall‐winter season of a double‐cropping system. Seven plant samplings were performed during the growing season, and the material was divided into stems, leaves, and reproductive structures. Seed yield and nutrient removal were determined at harvest. Safflower genotypes had similar 2‐yr average biomass accumulations and seed yields. There were greater plant growth and nutrient uptake from stem elongation to seed filling, compared to the other growth stages. The maximum rates of nutrient uptake were observed near the flowering stage. On average, a maximum uptake of 169 kg N, 16 kg P, 178 kg K, 121 kg Ca, 16 kg Mg, 15 kg S, 130 g Cu, 3298 g Fe, 420 g Mn, and 351 g Zn per hectare were required to produce about 10,500 and 1,400 kg ha−1 of aboveground biomass and seeds, respectively. Relative to the maximum aboveground nutrient accumulation, seeds contained 28% of P, 24% of N, 22% of Zn, 16% of Cu, 11% of Mg, 10% of S, 6% of K, 5% of Mn, 4% of Ca, and 4% of Fe. These quantifications of biomass and nutrient accumulation and partitioning in each growth stage of fall‐winter safflower can be used as guidelines for fertilizer recommendations for this crop in double‐cropping systems.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Biomass and nutrient accumulation and partitioning of fall‐winter safflower in a double‐cropping system of southeastern Brazil

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Brooke et al (1989), liming and/or deep ripping to break compact layers increased the yields of a wide range of crops. Wheat, oat, triticale (X. tritosecale) , safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), chick pea, (Cicer arietinum L.), barley, rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), and field pea (Pisum sativum) responded to lime but lupine (Lupinus sp.)…”

Section: A Modifying the Soilmentioning

confidence: 99%

Soil Chemical Factors Limiting Plant Root Growth

Foy¹

1992

Advances in Soil Science

328

162

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Excess soluble or exchangeable A1 is especially undesirable in subsoils because it reduces rooting depth and branching and it predisposes plants to drought injury (Goldman et al, 1989a(Goldman et al, , 1989bKauffman & Gardner, 1978;Kennedy et al, 1987). In most soils, liming the plow layer does not neutralise phytotoxic A1 in sub-surface layers and applying lime to subsoils is generally not economically feasible (Brooke et al, 1989;Foy, 1988;Kaufmann & Gardner, 1978;Long & Foy, 1970). In some instances, liming even the surface soil may not be feasible because soils must be kept acidic (below pH 5.4) for disease control, or because lime is unavailable or prohibitively expensive (Foy, 1988).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diallel analysis of tolerance to aluminium in alfalfa

et al. 1993

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Acid soils having high levels of aluminium (A1) can drastically reduce yields in alfalfa and the most economically viable solution to the problem appears to be the development of Al-tolerant cultivars. To assist with the choice of a breeding method, a six-parent alfalfa diallel (crosses and reciprocals included but not parents) was evaluated in Al-toxic nutrient solution in terms of height (HT) and dry weight (DW). General combining ability was significant for both traits and constituted the majority of the genetic variation. Specific combining ability was significant only for HT and reciprocal effects were significant only for DW. Tolerance appeared to be at least partially dominant to sensitivity. Results indicate that a mass selection scheme, such as recurrent phenotypic selection, may be effective in increasing levels of tolerance in at least some alfalfa populations and that minor grains may also be achieved through exploiting non-additive genetic variation.

show abstract

Liming and deep ripping responses for a range of field crops

Cited by 21 publications

References 9 publications

Biomass and nutrient accumulation and partitioning of fall‐winter safflower in a double‐cropping system of southeastern Brazil

Biomass and nutrient accumulation and partitioning of fall‐winter safflower in a double‐cropping system of southeastern Brazil

Soil Chemical Factors Limiting Plant Root Growth

Diallel analysis of tolerance to aluminium in alfalfa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About