2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-007-9369-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liming to remediate Ni contaminated soils with diverse properties and a wide range of Ni concentration

Abstract: Historic emissions from a Ni refinery at Port Colborne, Ontario, caused Ni contamination of regional soils and raised concerns about potential Ni phytotoxicity. Previous tests revealed that if these soils were made alkaline and fertilized with Mn and other common nutrients as needed to maintain fertility of such alkaline soils, full remediation (prevention of Ni phytotoxicity) would be obtained. This experiment was conducted to test this method of remediation on diverse soils from Port Colborne, and to evaluat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DTPA-extractable proportion of heavy metals pseudo-total concentration decreases in order Cu > Pb > Zn > Ni > Co, while DTPA extractable Cr was under the detection limit (0.007 μg Cr/ml). A very low phytoavailable proportion of pseudo total content was found in all samples for Ni (0.23%), Zn (0.51%) and Co (0.05%), possibly influenced by relatively high pH (>6.5) [40] and high organic content (2.98%) [41], while Cu and Pb had considerably higher available amounts (2.53 and 2.39%, respectively). However, positive correlation between pseudo-total and available amounts of heavy metals in soil was not found.…”
Section: Soil Properties and Metal Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…DTPA-extractable proportion of heavy metals pseudo-total concentration decreases in order Cu > Pb > Zn > Ni > Co, while DTPA extractable Cr was under the detection limit (0.007 μg Cr/ml). A very low phytoavailable proportion of pseudo total content was found in all samples for Ni (0.23%), Zn (0.51%) and Co (0.05%), possibly influenced by relatively high pH (>6.5) [40] and high organic content (2.98%) [41], while Cu and Pb had considerably higher available amounts (2.53 and 2.39%, respectively). However, positive correlation between pseudo-total and available amounts of heavy metals in soil was not found.…”
Section: Soil Properties and Metal Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It can be seen from the Table I that the total Ni concentration is in the interval from 45 to 148 mg/kg. 9 Soil as an experimental factor also exerted a statistically significant influence on the uptake of Ni by maize roots. Maximum allowed Ni concentration in agricultural soils is 50 mg/kg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, soil treatments such as soil washing are detrimental for soil structure and properties. For these reasons, less expensive techniques have been researched and developed including in situ remediation using limestone and Mn fertilizer (Siebielec et al 2007) and phytoextraction. Phytoextraction is capable of removing soil Ni if the chemical forms present in the contaminated soil can be dissolved and accumulated by hyperaccumulator plant roots ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%