2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of Animal Studies for Predicting Toxicity in Clinical Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
295
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 415 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
295
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although animal models have provided critical insight into how host-microbiota homeostasis is constructed and maintained [33] or influenced by infections or dietary factors [34], they do not faithfully represent the human body and they are not suitable models to assess drug efficacy nor to evaluate complex research questions [35][36][37]. Translating results from murine models to humans remains elusive due to the existence of several key differences between the two systems [38,39], including the anatomy and function of the mouse and human intestinal tract, immune system and interaction with pathogens [40], gut microbiota composition, feeding pattern, genetic background.…”
Section: Limitations Of Traditional In Vivo and In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although animal models have provided critical insight into how host-microbiota homeostasis is constructed and maintained [33] or influenced by infections or dietary factors [34], they do not faithfully represent the human body and they are not suitable models to assess drug efficacy nor to evaluate complex research questions [35][36][37]. Translating results from murine models to humans remains elusive due to the existence of several key differences between the two systems [38,39], including the anatomy and function of the mouse and human intestinal tract, immune system and interaction with pathogens [40], gut microbiota composition, feeding pattern, genetic background.…”
Section: Limitations Of Traditional In Vivo and In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high number of therapeutic compounds that fail to translate in clinical trials [37,77,78], coupled with increasing awareness of the ethical and scientific issues surrounding the use of animal models [38,39,79,80], highlights the need and importance for models that are more physiologically relevant to the human body to personalize treatments and better predict patient outcomes.…”
Section: Limitations Of Traditional In Vivo and In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although humans and mice share the same genes, their regulation mechanism is different [ 160 ]. Drug testing results vary according to which species is used [ 161 , 162 ]. Therefore, there is a significant demand for models made of human cells as an alternative to animal models.…”
Section: Drug Screening Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a growing need for reliable preclinical screening strategies for cardiovascular toxicities associated with emerging cancer therapies prior to human clinical trials. Animal models can fail in predicting drug adverse cardiac effects 10,11 , can be expensive and do not replicate many of the biochemical properties and hemodynamic aspects of the human heart and circulation [12][13][14] . Recently, human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) started being used to assess cardiotoxicity 15,16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%