1946
DOI: 10.2307/3002000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of the Application of Fourfold Table Analysis to Hospital Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
544
4
8

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,642 publications
(569 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
13
544
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The propensity to experience negative affect during recovery, however, usually diminishes rapidly as the period of abstinence increases (Brown & Schuckit, 1988;Davidson, 1995;de Timary et al, 2008;Driessen et al, 2001), suggesting that negative moods might be an acute consequence immediately following alcohol cessation that does not rise to the level of a diagnosable disorder. Another possible explanation for some differences in findings reported here and in treatment studies is that treatment samples likely include a preponderance of persons who have had multiple prior AUD episodes (Wang et al, 2005) and disorder comorbidities (Berkson, 1946;Low et al, 2008;Merikangas et al, 1996), and consist of individuals who are otherwise unrepresentative of persons who experience AUDs in the general population (Merikangas et al, 1994;Swendsen & Merikangas, 2000). Problem drinking and emotional disturbance in the present research were also operationalized at the disorder level of description, whereas the treatment studies summarized above often assessed anxiety or depressed mood with dimensional measures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The propensity to experience negative affect during recovery, however, usually diminishes rapidly as the period of abstinence increases (Brown & Schuckit, 1988;Davidson, 1995;de Timary et al, 2008;Driessen et al, 2001), suggesting that negative moods might be an acute consequence immediately following alcohol cessation that does not rise to the level of a diagnosable disorder. Another possible explanation for some differences in findings reported here and in treatment studies is that treatment samples likely include a preponderance of persons who have had multiple prior AUD episodes (Wang et al, 2005) and disorder comorbidities (Berkson, 1946;Low et al, 2008;Merikangas et al, 1996), and consist of individuals who are otherwise unrepresentative of persons who experience AUDs in the general population (Merikangas et al, 1994;Swendsen & Merikangas, 2000). Problem drinking and emotional disturbance in the present research were also operationalized at the disorder level of description, whereas the treatment studies summarized above often assessed anxiety or depressed mood with dimensional measures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In part, this association can be attributed to referral bias in favour of mothers with more severe and complex disorders [17]. But the link is supported by the frequent observation that a mother who has formed a normal postpartum relationship with her infant can lose the ‘bond’ after the onset and for the duration of the depression [1].…”
Section: Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these mothers are not depressed [16], and, when they are, the severity and course of the two disorders differ. They are usually associated in the clinic, where the association will be enhanced by Berkson bias [17,18], but in the community the association is lower or even absent [19]. Their treatments [20,21,22] and, to some extent, their causes are different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amyloid in normal subjects could represent undiagnosed diabetes in the normal population since diabetes cannot be excluded retrospectively, and autopsy studies of hospital patients could include a bias to a diabetes-enriched population. The presence of islet amyloid in nondiabetics in autopsy-based studies may be spurious and based on sampling from biased populations (10,11). Islet amyloid also occurs spontaneously in the diabetic monkey Macaca nigra (12) and in the diabetic domestic cat (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%