2007
DOI: 10.1142/s0219477507003854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited Resolution and Multiresolution Methods in Complex Network Community Detection

Abstract: Detecting community structure in real-world networks is a challenging problem. Recently, it has been shown that the resolution of methods based on optimizing a modularity measure or a corresponding energy is limited; communities with sizes below some threshold remain unresolved. One possibility to go around this problem is to vary the threshold by using a tuning parameter, and investigate the community structure at variable resolutions. Here, we analyze the resolution limit and multiresolution behavior for two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiresolution methods [90,91,92,62,93] extend the ideas of community detection to identify the "best" division(s) over a range of network scales ("resolutions"). We test s independent realizations of the system ("replicas") over all relevant network scales by specifying different values of γ in Eq.…”
Section: Multiresolution Community Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiresolution methods [90,91,92,62,93] extend the ideas of community detection to identify the "best" division(s) over a range of network scales ("resolutions"). We test s independent realizations of the system ("replicas") over all relevant network scales by specifying different values of γ in Eq.…”
Section: Multiresolution Community Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of very stable system resolutions, local extrema can be replaced by plateaus in these information theory measures that indicate no change in the system solution over an extended range of resolution scales γ (as seen in the networks examined in [62] and, in the appendix of the current work, in some crisp lattice systems analyzed in Appendix O). We can further extract additional qualitative information about the "stability" of network partitions across a range of resolutions by examining the average number of clusters q [90,91,94], mutual information I [90], or the Shannon entropy H [62,94]. .…”
Section: Multiresolution Community Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arenas et al [36] defined a multiresolution method using modularity that makes novel use of the resolution limit [30]. Reichardt and Bornholdt [10], Arenas et al [36], Kumpula and coworkers [37], and Heimo et al [38] also study multiresolution applications of an RB Potts model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of heuristics were proposed to maximize modularity. They rely on simulated annealing [16], extremal optimization [17], mean field annealing [18], genetic search [19], dynamical clustering [20], multilevel partitioning [21], contraction-dilation [22], multistep greedy [23], quantum mechanics [24] and a variety of other approaches [25,26,27,28,29,30]. These heuristics provide, usually in moderate time, near optimal partitions for the modularity criterion or, possibly, optimal partitions but without the proof of their optimality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two such examples will be discussed later. To paliate this problem several modifications to the modularity function were proposed [44,30] and heuristics generalized accordingly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%