1994
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199404283301718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited Tolerance of Ofloxacin and Pyrazinamide Prophylaxis against Tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present report is, to the current authors' knowledge, the first to describe a high rate of drug-induced hepatitis in contacts treated in this context with a combination of PZA and EMB. Previous publications have described high rates of drug-induced hepatitis in contacts treated by PZA with either levofloxacin (47%) or ofloxacin (25-41%) [9][10][11]. Median time to peak increase in ASAT and/or ASAT was approximately 4 weeks in these three studies, with a wide variability (drug-induced hepatitis occurring up to 25 weeks after beginning of treatment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present report is, to the current authors' knowledge, the first to describe a high rate of drug-induced hepatitis in contacts treated in this context with a combination of PZA and EMB. Previous publications have described high rates of drug-induced hepatitis in contacts treated by PZA with either levofloxacin (47%) or ofloxacin (25-41%) [9][10][11]. Median time to peak increase in ASAT and/or ASAT was approximately 4 weeks in these three studies, with a wide variability (drug-induced hepatitis occurring up to 25 weeks after beginning of treatment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Due to the lower hepatic toxicity of RIF alone, rather than that of PZA, the question of the toxicity of PZA and its' acceptability in a prophylactic treatment has been raised [7,8]. To date, information as to the toxicity of PZA in combination with either EMB or a fluoroquinolone is scarce [9][10][11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the clinical situation mirrors our results in mice, susceptibility of the infecting isolate to Z may indicate the potential for short-course therapy of 9 months or less if Z is continued. On the other hand, continuing Z in the face of resistance may not provide any treatment-shortening benefit while increasing the risk of intolerance and/or toxicity, as observed with fluoroquinolone-Z combinations used to treat latent TB infection among MDR-TB contacts (46)(47)(48)(49). Given the favorable interactions between Z and new TB drugs in development and rising concerns over Z resistance among MDR-TB isolates, improved susceptibility testing methods for Z, including genotypic resistance testing, will continue to require attention in the future (50)(51)(52)(53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the use of MXF alone (or in combination with EMB) for 9 to 12 mo may constitute an efficacious oral regimen for persons intolerant of PZA or ETH. Given the apparent frequency with which PZA and regimens containing PZA have been implicated in causing hepatotoxicity (7,(14)(15)(16)(17)40), such a regimen may provide a valuable alternative regimen for patients with MDR-LTBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in some outbreak settings, combinations of PZA with ofloxacin or levofloxacin have been associated with treatment-limiting hepatotoxicity (14)(15)(16)(17). The paucity of data regarding the efficacy of these or other chemoprophylactic regimens for treatment of MDR-LTBI is of great concern given the increasing prevalence of MDR-TB in many parts of the world and the potential use of MDR-TB strains as agents of bioterrorism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%