2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(00)01559-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits of using bilinear stress–strain curve for finite element modeling of nanoindentation response on bulk materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A three-sided Berkovich diamond indenter tip was used with a total included angle of 142.3°. As mentioned by several authors [14,17], indentations using a Berkovich indenter result in the same force vs. displacement curve as a conical indenter with a half apex angle θ = 70.3°. This is the reason why various authors have preferred to simplify numerical modeling using a 2-D axisymmetric mesh with a conical indenter instead of a 3-D Berkovich one.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A three-sided Berkovich diamond indenter tip was used with a total included angle of 142.3°. As mentioned by several authors [14,17], indentations using a Berkovich indenter result in the same force vs. displacement curve as a conical indenter with a half apex angle θ = 70.3°. This is the reason why various authors have preferred to simplify numerical modeling using a 2-D axisymmetric mesh with a conical indenter instead of a 3-D Berkovich one.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Pelletier et al [17] showed that the numerical modeling of the curvature of the indenter tip has an influence on load vs. displacement curves. He found that a more realistic model of that curvature leads to results in better agreement with experimental ones.…”
Section: Effect Of Indenter Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hardness of foils is quite different from hardness of bulk material which is about 1.77 GPa for bulk copper [16] and 0.84 GPa for bulk zinc [16]. These differences are due to size effect.…”
Section: Mechanical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The results are summarized in Table 1. Elastic moduli of foils are inferior to moduli of bulk materials which are equal to 145 GPa for pure copper [16] and 84 GPa for pure zinc [16]. This point is quite surprising since several studies during last decades have shown that thin films tend to exhibit similar Young's modulus that bulk material [3,5].…”
Section: Mechanical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%