1978
DOI: 10.1139/v78-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits to barriers to internal rotation in benzal fluoride, chloride, and bromide solution by the J method

Abstract: . 56,36(1978). On the basis of the long-range couplings over six bonds between the protons on the side chain and the ring protons in benzal fluoride, chloride, and bromide and some of their derivatives, a hindered rotor model ( J method) yields limits to the barriers to internal rotation. These are 0.0 to 1.8,0.7 to 2.4, and 1.7 to 3.8 kcal/mol for the fluoride, chloride, and bromide, respectively. Refinement of the model suggests barriers of 1.1 f 0.2, 2.2 f 0.3, and 3.5 rt 0.6 kcall mol, respectively. The ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The o contributions are positive. The o-n: contribution to 'JrnHfCH3 is also positive because, although QCH and QccH are of opposite sign, the induced n: electron spin density at C-3 is negative (a result of electron correlation, the spin densities at C-2 and C-4 being positive), as discussed previously (10). On the other hand, the o-n contribution to 5 J m F , C H 3 is negative because QcF and QccH have the same sign, positive, and this contribution outweighs the o electron component, resulting in a negative 5 J m F , C H 3 .…”
Section: Long-range 19fc19~ Couplingssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The o contributions are positive. The o-n: contribution to 'JrnHfCH3 is also positive because, although QCH and QccH are of opposite sign, the induced n: electron spin density at C-3 is negative (a result of electron correlation, the spin densities at C-2 and C-4 being positive), as discussed previously (10). On the other hand, the o-n contribution to 5 J m F , C H 3 is negative because QcF and QccH have the same sign, positive, and this contribution outweighs the o electron component, resulting in a negative 5 J m F , C H 3 .…”
Section: Long-range 19fc19~ Couplingssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…and J? : , ?, in toluene derivatives have been discussed in some detail (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). In addition to their intrinsic interest as indicators of electronic structure, some of these couplings are useful in the aetermination of conformational preferences and, indeed, of internal barriers to rotation in benzene derivatives (13)(14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, assume a 6~0 of -0.02 Hz for benzal chloride. Then (sin2 0) becomes 0.15 (1) for the CDC13 solution and the apparent V2 rises to 10.2(6) kT/mol only. Finally, although not supported by the MO calculations, consider the possible presence of a fourfold component in the internal rotational potential.…”
Section: Solvent Dependence Of the Barriermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The magnitude of 6~9 0 depends on the electronegativity of the substituents on the side chain. The large uncertainty in 6~9 0 at that time ( I ) led to the range of barriers quoted above, although a value of 9.2 t 1.3 kJ/mol was assessed with a lesser degree of confidence (1). The measured value of 6J suggested that 1 was the conformation of lowest energy in CS2 solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Substitution in the methyl group to give a CH2X or a CHX, sidechain changes the sixfold barrier for a CH, group to one of a predominantly twofold nature. These twofold barriers have been investigated in solution for X = F, C1, Br, I, CH, (3)(4)(5) and a variety of other X substituents (6,7). The investigations are mainly based on the sin2 8 dependence of 6~p H .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%