1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(98)00011-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits to the ductility of metal sheets subjected to complex strain-paths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2b). Hydraulic bulge tests can give more informations about the nature of the material anisotropy and its dependence to the strain paths (Mesrar et al, 1998).…”
Section: Tensile Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b). Hydraulic bulge tests can give more informations about the nature of the material anisotropy and its dependence to the strain paths (Mesrar et al, 1998).…”
Section: Tensile Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a given value of θ b , ψ b can be determined from equation ( 23) and ε b is derived from equation (24). As for the bulk, the principal strain-increment ε b 1 and ε b 2 are determined using equation (7), and the through-thickness strainincrement ε a 3 is determined from the condition of plastic incompressibility.…”
Section: Iterative Solution Of the Localization Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of material ductility has received a great deal of attention during the last thirty years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. For sheet metals under biaxial tension, the forming limit diagram (FLD) is currently employed as an indicator of ductility [11,12]. The FLD represents the plot of the value ε * 1 of the larger surface strain against the limit value ε * 2 of the smaller surface strain under proportional in-plane loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The onset of necking is often defined by the appearance of a much higher strain rate inside a shear band than outside. That definition is successfully exploited within the framework of the MK approach [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], where the location of a shear band is known. In the case of a material imperfection based method, the morphology of the localisation zone is unknown and therefore this straight-forward approach cannot be pursued.…”
Section: Localisation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MK analysis was successfully used to predict the formability under monotonic deformation [5,6] and deformation with strain path changes [7][8][9]. Within the MK framework, the influence of various constitutive features on FLDs has been explored using phenomenological plasticity models [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%